Calculating Volume of a Parallelepiped in R^n

  • Thread starter mbs
  • Start date
In summary, the area of a parallelogram generated by two vectors v_1 and v_2 in \Re^3 is given by \left|v_1\times v_2\right|. This concept can be extended to three vectors in \Re^4, where they can be represented as columns in a 4 by 3 matrix. By using Givens rotations, all diagonal elements can be made non-negative and the product of these elements gives the area of a 3-D parallelepiped in the hyperplane spanned by the vectors. This product is called the "triple" product. It can also be generalized to any m vectors in \Re^n, where m\leq n. When m
  • #1
mbs
39
1
Say you have two vectors [tex]v_1[/tex] and [tex]v_2[/tex] in [tex]\Re^3[/tex]. Then the area of the parallelogram generated by these two vectors is [tex]\left|v_1\times v_2\right|[/tex].

Now consider the case where you have three vectors in [tex]\Re^4[/tex]. You can place these vectors as columns in a 4 by 3 matrix. Now if you simultaneously rotate the three matrices together using Givins rotations you can introduce zeros in all entries below the main diagonal and non-negative values in all the diagonal elements. If the three matrices are linearly independent then all the diagonal elements will be positive. Now the product of the diagonal elements gives the area of a 3-D parallelepiped embedded in the hyperplane spanned by the vectors in [tex]\Re^4[/tex]. What would you call this type of "triple" product?

This can be generalized to any [tex]m[/tex] vectors in [tex]\Re^n[/tex] as long as [tex]m\leq n[/tex]. When [tex]m=n[/tex] this product is just the absolute value of the determinant of the matrix formed by the vectors as columns.

It seems that in general this type of product will appear under the integral when integrating over some m dimensional hyper-surface that's embedded in [tex]\Re^n[/tex]. It would be used for calculating the volume element [tex]dV[/tex] on an m dimensional hyper-surface.

Hopefully this makes sense.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think the thing I'm thinking of is related to the exterior algebra, though I don't really understand the notation/terminogy.
 

1. How do you define a parallelepiped in R^n?

A parallelepiped in R^n is a geometric figure with six faces, each of which is a parallelogram. It is defined by three non-collinear vectors in R^n, representing the lengths of its three edges.

2. What is the formula for calculating the volume of a parallelepiped in R^n?

The formula for calculating the volume of a parallelepiped in R^n is V = |a · (b x c)|, where a, b, and c are the three vectors representing the lengths of the edges of the parallelepiped. This formula is known as the triple scalar product.

3. Can the volume of a parallelepiped in R^n be negative?

No, the volume of a parallelepiped in R^n cannot be negative. Since volume is a measure of space, it is always a positive value. However, if the orientation of the vectors representing the edges of the parallelepiped is reversed, the volume will be negative.

4. How does the calculation of volume for a parallelepiped in R^n differ from a cube or rectangular prism?

The calculation of volume for a parallelepiped in R^n differs from a cube or rectangular prism because a parallelepiped can have different angles between its edges, while a cube and rectangular prism have 90 degree angles. Additionally, the formula for a cube or rectangular prism is simply V = l*w*h, whereas the formula for a parallelepiped involves a dot product and cross product.

5. Is it possible to calculate the volume of a parallelepiped in R^n with just the lengths of its edges?

No, it is not possible to calculate the volume of a parallelepiped in R^n with just the lengths of its edges. The vectors representing the edges also need to be known in order to calculate the volume using the formula V = |a · (b x c)|.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
588
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
344
Back
Top