What is you favor law of nature,

  • Thread starter kant
  • Start date
  • #1
360
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Principles, math theorm.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,134
7
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
 
  • #3
Aren't maths theorems just approximations of the laws of nature,even constants like the fine structure constant are not 100% accurate.

I'd say the best law of nature is evolution followed by gravity perhaps.:smile:


man.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,051
17
Aren't maths theorems just approximations of the laws of nature
Maths does not concern itself with the laws of nature. That is the job of physics.

even constants like the fine structure constant are not 100% accurate.
What exactly do you mean by this? It is a measurement or a description that possesses the property of accuracy. The value of the constant, just like the value of any other measured quantity (that isn't quantized) as determined by measurement, naturally can not be had to an arbitrary accuracy (heck, is it even possible to write down an arbitrary real number in a finite time?).
 
  • #5
Maths does not concern itself with the laws of nature. That is the job of physics.
Erm ok, do you not think that was a little bit of a nit pick? I think it's clear what he's referring too, and what I am, I was pointing out that maths is not an exact reflection of the laws of nature, on it's own. In other words?

What exactly do you mean by this? It is a measurement or a description that possesses the property of accuracy. The value of the constant, just like the value of any other measured quantity (that isn't quantized) as determined by measurement, naturally can not be had to an arbitrary accuracy (heck, is it even possible to write down an arbitrary real number in a finite time?).
Exactly what you just said, so why has he said maths theorems? And by maths theorems I presume he's talking about mathematical terms that apply to theory, or nature, thus the ?

I kind of get the feeling that we are both saying the same thing pretty much.

When I think of a law of nature I don't think of

[tex] F_g=G.\frac{m1m2}{r^2}[/tex]

I tend to think of gravity and the discussion of gravity's effects as the law and the maths as the closest representation possible of these effects given condtion x.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,051
17
I didn't read the question that way. I read it as "what are your favorite laws of nature, principles, and math theorems?" But I still don't understand what you mean by :
I was pointing out that maths is not an exact reflection of the laws of nature
That is exactly the opposite of what I was trying to say; that it does not attempt to be one. I guess it's just not as clear to me as it is to you.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
I see what you mean? Very odd way of writing the question, I've not seen someone do that before, never mind.:smile: Obviously my mistake.

That is exactly the opposite of what I was trying to say; that it does not attempt to be one. I guess it's just not as clear to me as it is to you.
Well considering I misinterpreted the question, I didn't think that was made clear? Anyway doesn't matter.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,051
17
I've seen lots of people split up a sentence between the thread title and the first part of the OP. Can be quite confusing.
 
  • #9
1,104
25
a^2+b^2=c^2
 
  • #10
Chi Meson
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,789
10
I think we just saw the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics at work in the first 8 posts!:smile:

Go 2nd Law!
 

Related Threads for: What is you favor law of nature,

Replies
64
Views
12K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
5K
Top