1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

What this symbol mean

  1. Nov 22, 2008 #1
    <x,y>+<x,y>= (a1*a2 +b1*b2 +c1*c2) + (a1*a2 +b1*b2 +c1*c2)=2*(a1*a2 +b1*b2 +c1*c2)

    i have <x,y> + <x,y> it written that it equals


    what 2Re<x,y> means ??
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 22, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Re means "the real part of..."
  4. Nov 22, 2008 #3
    buts its not a complex number its a vector operation

    why to involve therms from complex numbers in that formula when developed it other wise

    <x,y>+<x,y>= (a1*a2 +b1*b2 +c1*c2) + (a1*a2 +b1*b2 +c1*c2)=2*(a1*a2 +b1*b2 +c1*c2)

    why am i mistaken?

    http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/7205/97924861fq7.gif [Broken]

    and what the meaning of |< >| marked in blue in the link
    Last edited by a moderator: May 3, 2017
  5. Nov 22, 2008 #4
    if you look carefully, it says <x,y> + <y,x>, not <x,y> + <x,y>.

    if the inner product is defined on a complex vector space, which means that a1,b1,c1, a2,b2,c2 are complex numbers, then <x,y> is a complex number, and <y,x> is the complex conjugate of <x,y>
    in which case | < > | means the complex norm of the complex number given by the inner product.
  6. Nov 22, 2008 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I believe that the vectors are supposed to be complex and the asterisks should represent complex conjugates. Note then too that the order in the inner product matters. Your formula is then a bit off and should read:

    [tex]\langle x,y \rangle + \langle y , x \rangle = \cdots = 2\Re(\langle x , y \rangle ) [/tex]

    Reversing the inner product effects a complex conjugate of the value thus adding both you cancel out the imaginary part and get twice the real part.
  7. Nov 22, 2008 #6
    when i wrote astrix i ment multiplication
  8. Nov 22, 2008 #7
    whats the full formula for <x,y>
    (including the complex part)

  9. Nov 22, 2008 #8
  10. Nov 22, 2008 #9


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I know you ment it as multiplication but...
    1.) If you are working with complex vectors (implied by the [tex]\Re[/tex]), and
    2.) If you are working with a Hermitian inner product, then
    the complex conjugate is required:

    [tex] \langle x , y \rangle = x_1^* \cdot y_1 + x_2^*\cdot y_2 + \ldots [/tex]

    (where I am using * for complex conjugate and [tex]\cdot[/tex] for multiplication.)

    If you are not working with a Hermitian inner product then the formula is just plain wrong.
    If you are not working with possibly complex vectors then the formula is trivial:
    [tex] \langle x,y\rangle + \langle x , y \rangle = 2\langle x , y \rangle[/tex]

    See what I mean?

    You didn't state from where you got your formula or for what reason you are writing it. You asked about the [tex]\Re[/tex] = "Re" symbol and I can only assume it came from some assignment or text. I am also extrapolating that the text must be talking about complex vectors with a Hermitian inner product.

    Go back to your source of information and recheck it without the assumptions that the vectors are real or that [tex]\langle x , y \rangle = \langle y , x \rangle[/tex]
  11. Nov 22, 2008 #10
  12. Nov 22, 2008 #11
    why are they
    opening the 2ab part
    not as <x,y> + <x,y>

    but as
    <x,y> + <y,x>

  13. Nov 22, 2008 #12


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    For the reasons stated above. Note that that section of the wikipedia article proves the inequality for an arbitrary inner product space, that is, a vector space endowed with an inner product. There is nothing that says the vectors have to be real

    If I may, I'd suggest you didn't try and learn things from wikipedia, but instead invest in a good book.
  14. Nov 22, 2008 #13


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It's about vectors real or complex. In the real case [tex]Re( \langle x, y \rangle) = \langle x,y \rangle[/tex] hence the "or equals" in the first inequality relation.

    In the complex case they are in effect invoking the triangle inequality on the complex norm:

    Let [tex]Re(\langle x,y \rangle) = a+bi[/tex]
    Then [tex] |a| \le |a|+|b| \le |a+bi| = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}[/tex]
    where a, b are real numbers and the second inequality is the trangle inequality on the complex norm.

    Note that we can write the complex squared norm norm as:
    [tex] a^2+b^2= (a+bi)^*\cdot (a+bi) = c^* c[/tex]
    where [tex] c = a+bi[/tex] our complex number. Recall that [tex] i^2 = -1[/tex] and [tex] (a+bi)^* = a-bi[/tex] (where a,b are real).

    Thence the magnitude of a complex number is [tex] |c| = \sqrt{c^* c} = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}[/tex]

    Also [tex] Re(c) \equiv \Re(c) = a[/tex] and [tex] Im(c) = \Im(c) = b[/tex] is just a way to indicate the real and imaginary parts of a complex number.

    That is all the details implicit in the wiki article. Sit down and work them out on paper and you should be able to see what's goin' on.
  15. Nov 22, 2008 #14
    whats a complex conjugate??
  16. Nov 22, 2008 #15
    Maybe you should start learning the basics.... and then go on to more advanced topics....
  17. Nov 22, 2008 #16
    ok now i know whats complex conjugate

    know i will read it all over again
  18. Nov 22, 2008 #17
    what the values of x1 ,y1 ,x2 ,y2

    \langle x , y \rangle = x_1^* \cdot y_1 + x_2^*\cdot y_2 + \ldots
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2008
  19. Nov 24, 2008 #18


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I was using subscripted x's to indicate the x vector's coordinates. Your a,b,c my x_1 x_2 x_3.
    That way we can talk about a vector with more than 3 or even 26 coordinates/dimensions.

    BTW One way to think about complex conjugation is to remember we invented i to be one of the two square roots of -1 The other of course is -i
    [tex]i^2=-1, i = \pm \sqrt{-1}[/tex].
    Complex conjugation switches this choice, i.e. where ever an i occurs replace it with -i.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook