So it seems that Bell + experimental confirmation (which is suggestively strong, but I'm not sure it is 100% watertight) makes us choose between:
- a philosophically satisfying concept, that "what we see, IS there, and ONLY that" OR
- the formal principle of relativity.
So, in response to certain experimental outcomes which you SEE, you conclude that you can't trust what you see.
Good logic. :rofl: