1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Whats the name

  1. Mar 11, 2005 #1
    I just wonder whats the name of the serries 1/1!+2/2!+3/3!... I know it equals e but I just whant to know how it's called.

    PS. Titels of good books abot serries would allso be welcome.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 11, 2005 #2

    nd

    User Avatar

    [tex]\displaystyle e=\sum \limits_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!}[/tex], if I remember correctly.
    What are you interested in learning about series?
    Most series, as far as I know, don't have names.
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2005
  4. Mar 11, 2005 #3

    Hurkyl

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Exercise: prove the series written in the first two posts are the same!


    I don't think this particular series has a name. However, it is the evaluation of the Taylor series for e^x at x = 1, or more specifically, the MacLauren series.
     
  5. Mar 11, 2005 #4

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Hurkyl, they are not the same. The series in the first post was
    [tex]\frac{1}{1!}+ \frac{2}{2!}+ \frac{3}{3!}+...= 1+ 1+ \frac{1}{2!}+ ...[/tex]
    and so is e+ 1, not e.
     
  6. Mar 11, 2005 #5

    shmoe

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    They're both e.

    [tex]e^x=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^n}{n!}[/tex]

    [tex]\displaystyle e=\sum \limits_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!}=\frac{1}{0!}+\frac{1}{1!}+\frac{1}{2!}\ldots=1+1+\frac{1}{2!}+\ldots[/tex]
     
  7. Mar 11, 2005 #6
    They realy are both e. I tried to prove thath and I think I maneged to prove that they are equal for very large n, where 1/n is almost equal to 0. It's actualy qouit easy to do it with the use of the binomical expresion.

    PS. But I still don't get it why it's so much fester to do it with a series. When you get to the 13'th element (13/13!) it's allready excet to 10 digits. But if you do it as (1+1/n) on n, you have to use a very large n to get such an excet figure. Why is that?

    PPS. Thanks for the info Hurkley.
     
  8. Mar 11, 2005 #7

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    What? I'm wrong? Moi?? Oh, blast, I started my series with n=1 instead of n= 0!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Whats the name
Loading...