- #386
FZ+
- 1,604
- 3
Since you deemed me ignorant, you might ignore this.
But irreducible complexity has indeed been fully falsified.
The critical error made is to once again implant the creationist idea of set goals to work to. It doesn't happen like that. The production of many "irreducibly complex" organs have been demonstrated by either peripherals shifting to different functions, or by the development of redundant systems that disappear, in the same way as scaffolding is removed. In the analogy of the watch, in constructing the watch, additional features like clamps exist, and then are removed. Many of these redundant features that are disappearing can still be seen. (eg. the appendix)
Behe is a laughing stock of the biological community.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/behe.html
But irreducible complexity has indeed been fully falsified.
The critical error made is to once again implant the creationist idea of set goals to work to. It doesn't happen like that. The production of many "irreducibly complex" organs have been demonstrated by either peripherals shifting to different functions, or by the development of redundant systems that disappear, in the same way as scaffolding is removed. In the analogy of the watch, in constructing the watch, additional features like clamps exist, and then are removed. Many of these redundant features that are disappearing can still be seen. (eg. the appendix)
Behe is a laughing stock of the biological community.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/behe.html