When is a particles charge spread out?

  • Thread starter box
  • Start date

box

12
0
Correct me if i'm wrong but i think in quantum mechanics there are times when the charge of an electron is spread out in the area where its positon is uncertin, such has a ground state hydrogen atom. And there are times when even though the electrons position is unknown over a certin area the charge is not spread over the whole area but is modeled to be in a more certin spot. Such has when you have two protons and one electron that is equaly likely to be orbiting both of them, The protons don't repell each other because the electrons charge is only on one of them and not evenly spread betwen the two. So am I right in saying that sometimes an elecrons charge is spread out over the area were its position is uncertin and somtimes its not? If so what determines if its the former or the latter?
 
538
2
aS PER hEISENBERG'S uNCERTAINITY pRINCIPLE , YOU CANNOT POSSIBLE DTERMINE THE VELOCITY AND POSITION OF AN ELECTRON simultaneously..

Imagine this , suppose you witness a fast moving electron and wth great precision you pin it up against the wall with a pin, before pinning it up , the electron was so fast that you couldnot determine its position and now you pinned it up in hope to determine the position correctly, now when you see the pinned-electron , it spreads itself and looks more like a cloud rather than a particle , this is what happens as per Heisenberg's..

More at :
http://www.doxlab.co.nr/
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,950
532
box said:
Correct me if i'm wrong but i think in quantum mechanics there are times when the charge of an electron is spread out in the area where its positon is uncertin, such has a ground state hydrogen atom. And there are times when even though the electrons position is unknown over a certin area the charge is not spread over the whole area but is modeled to be in a more certin spot. Such has when you have two protons and one electron that is equaly likely to be orbiting both of them, The protons don't repell each other because the electrons charge is only on one of them and not evenly spread betwen the two. So am I right in saying that sometimes an elecrons charge is spread out over the area were its position is uncertin and somtimes its not? If so what determines if its the former or the latter?
Ever heard of overlap integral,or charge exchange integral...?My guess is "no".

Daniel.
 

reilly

Science Advisor
1,075
0
For nonrelativistic QM, the square of the electron's wave function times the electric charge is the spatial charge density, which in turn is determined by the specific dynamics of the electron's system. For relativistic QM the same is true -- up to a few technical matters.

There are no stable two-proton one or two electron systems. Replace a proton by a neutron, and you are talking helium city, a stable place.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,950
532
I think he meant a Hidrogen molecule.That's pretty stable.And it has no neutrons.


Daniel.
 

box

12
0
reilly said:
For nonrelativistic QM, the square of the electron's wave function times the electric charge is the spatial charge density,
This is what I guessed but when reading the Feynman lectures on physics vol 3 chapter 10 he talks about a two state system made up of two separated protons with one electron thats orbiting a different proton in each state. Now when you have a superposition of both states I would guesse the electrons charge would be spread out over both protons (it seemes to me your statment above says this) but then I would think the protons would repel each other. However Feynman says the protons don't repel because one proton is nutrual because of the electron orbiting it. (well they did repel or atract but not because both protons were positive)
Sorry if what I wrote dosn't make alot of sense.
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,950
532
Since you're talkig about the H_{2} molecule,words won't do.Mathematics should come first.So how about you do some reading & caculations...?The proton may be screened,but not neutral.

Daniel.
 
699
8
Hello box,

it seems strange that a [itex]H_{2}^{+}[/itex] molecule exists, because as you mentioned one would think that the protons repel each other. However QM calculations indeed show that it is stable only because of that one electron.

Why is this so? You can think of the electron acting as glue between the protons (or as dextercioby said the proton's charge is screened by the electron's negative charge)
 

ZapperZ

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
2018 Award
35,127
3,927
Edgardo said:
Hello box,

it seems strange that a [itex]H_{2}^{+}[/itex] molecule exists, because as you mentioned one would think that the protons repel each other. However QM calculations indeed show that it is stable only because of that one electron.

Why is this so? You can think of the electron acting as glue between the protons (or as dextercioby said the proton's charge is screened by the electron's negative charge)
And this is a good opportunity to add that that single electron in between the two H nucleus is actually in a Schrodinger Cat-type state where it is "localized" at BOTH nucleus simultaneously! [See? All of physics/QM are really connected!] The electron is being spread out over both nucleus in such a way that the overlap of its location from both nucleus causes a bonding state and an antibonding state of the ground state. This is something chemists have seen way before QM, but it had to wait till QM for there to be an explanation for the existence of such a state.

Zz.
 

Gokul43201

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
6,987
14
To answer the original question :
box said:
So am I right in saying that sometimes an elecrons charge is spread out over the area were its position is uncertin and somtimes its not?
No, that's not right. As explained previously, the charge density at some point [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] scales with the probability of finding the electron in the vicinity of [itex]\vec{r}[/itex].

[tex]\rho(\vec{r}) = e|\psi({\vec{r})|^2 [/tex]
 

Related Threads for: When is a particles charge spread out?

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
10
Views
872

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top