Sign the Petition: Stop Teaching Intelligent Design in Public Schools

[pattylou]

I'd like all the academics who visit this board to be aware of this 4 - day petition that has started today. It will be sent to the court case in PA, regarding the teaching of ID in public school science classes.

Evo, I didn't know if this was general, politics, or Biology. I thought the more academics that saw it, the better. Where should it go?

Link to petition to not have Intelligent Design taught as science in our public schools:

http://shovelbums.org/index.php?option=com_mospetition&Itemid=506

-Patty

 

[Townsend]

I'd like all the academics who visit this board to be aware of this 4 - day petition that has started today. It will be sent to the court case in PA, regarding the teaching of ID in public school science classes.

Evo, I didn't know if this was general, politics, or Biology. I thought the more academics that saw it, the better. Where should it go?

Link to petition to not have Intelligent Design taught as science in our public schools:

http://shovelbums.org/index.php?option=com_mospetition&Itemid=506

-Patty

I don't believe in god or more correctly I would say I don't know enough or have enough information to have a belief that god does or does not exist.

That being said I have heard of some very famous philosophers that have spent some time looking at ID and they think it is has some merit. I don't even know what ID is and to honest I don't care enough about it to learn more but what I am concerned about is that through out history new ideas are often treated very badly that later turn out to be correct. I don't know if that will be the case with this but who knows for sure. And since there are some academics who apparently have some very convincing arguments in favor of ID I think we should at least spend some time looking at it before we outright condemn it.

 

[Danger]

A most excellent endeavour! Unfortunately, I'm not qualified to sign it. All power to them, and I'll pass the word.

Townsend, ID is simply Creationism in sheep's clothing. They thought that by changing the name, they'd fake the uneducated masses into believing that it's a science. :grumpy:

 

[pattylou]

I don't believe in god or more correctly I would say I don't know enough or have enough information to have a belief that god does or does not exist.

That being said I have heard of some very famous philosophers that have spent some time looking at ID and they think it is has some merit. I don't even know what ID is and to honest I don't care enough about it to learn more but what I am concerned about is that through out history new ideas are often treated very badly that later turn out to be correct. I don't know if that will be the case with this but who knows for sure. And since there are some academics who apparently have some very convincing arguments in favor of ID I think we should at least spend some time looking at it before we outright condemn it.

The issue is whether it is science.

History has merit too, but you don't clog up a cell biology class teaching the civil war.

 

[Townsend]

The issue is whether it is science.

History has merit too, but you don't clog up a cell biology class teaching the civil war.

I certainly agree that it should not be a science class but it certainly would qualify as a philosophy class.

 

[Moonbear]

I certainly agree that it should not be a science class but it certainly would qualify as a philosophy class.

The petition states that the signers do not necessarily object to it being taught elsewhere in the curriculum, but that it is not science, so should not be taught within the science curriculum.

Thanks for the link Patty, though I signed it but didn't see my name show up on the list...is it working right, or is there a delay before the names are posted?

Edit: Nevermind, I just realized the most recent names are on page 1, not the last page.

 

[Townsend]

The petition states that the signers do not necessarily object to it being taught elsewhere in the curriculum, but that it is not science, so should not be taught within the science curriculum.

I see...well then, have at it.

 

[pattylou]

I agree that it is great for philosophy, etc. And those fields are "equal" to science in many ways. I often think that faith is more important than knowledge, but I *never* think we should try to pigeonhole either into the other.

 

[pattylou]

Wow. 38 more signatures just since I signed. this'll be fun to watch grow.

 

[Evo]

I guess ID is as worthy of a philosophical discussion as a discussion of whether my bedpost is sentient.

Thanks Patty, I will also sign, although, I don't think ID should be taught anywhere outside of a bible class.

edit: looks like they only want scientists to sign, oh well.

 

[Bystander]

Two to four signatures a minute --- 6815 total so far --- dig it.

 

[Moonbear]

There's been over 200 signatures since I signed it! This is great to see!

 

[pattylou]

It's interesting to see the religious affiliations as well. MikeX had asked on Biology, for percentages of biologists that are atheist. This petition provides raw data to make a rough estimate.

Over 7000 names... It seemed to me that roughly 30% of respondents gave a religious affiliation of one sort or another (around 2000), of those 30% some were atheist/nonreligious and others were from all corners of faith - buddhism, muslim, various christian denominations, unitarian universalism, atheism...

Edit: Actually of the last 100 signatures:

64 kept the information private. Of the 36 that acknowledged a religious identity, 10 claimed atheism, 2 claimed agnositicism, and the other 22 claimed a religious affiliation.

 

[matthyaouw]

I don't think I'm qualified to sign :(

 

[pattylou]

You (or anyone) can forward it to anyone you might know who is qualified to sign. Maybe your biology professor at school, for example. I guarantee they'll be interested, although I don't know if signatures from other countries will "count" or not.

 

[Evo]

Bumping this back up.

 

[pattylou]

Some "fast facts" :

over 8040 signatures in 4 days (the "official" signing period is over for the purpose of creating an amicus brief, but the petition will stay open for additional signatures out of public interest.) There are many interesting fast facts on the website now, go have a look. Two that I enjoyed were these:

* The discovery institute took four years to get 400 professionals signatures opposing Darwinism!
* Shovel Bums received over 325 signatures in the first 4 hours this petition has been up

...and over 8000 in four days.

 

[GCT]

I'd like all the academics who visit this board to be aware of this 4 - day petition that has started today. It will be sent to the court case in PA, regarding the teaching of ID in public school science classes.

Evo, I didn't know if this was general, politics, or Biology. I thought the more academics that saw it, the better. Where should it go?

Link to petition to not have Intelligent Design taught as science in our public schools:

http://shovelbums.org/index.php?opt...tion&Itemid=506

-Patty

What's the big deal of teaching intelligent design in schools, does it bother you that much? Do you think that the kids will become any smarter if it were excluded? Don't you have anything better to do?

What really bothers me more than religious ranting (which applies to some member of religious groups) are the people who think that they are smarter than them...then proceed to join the senseless argument. Both sides of the comprise the same group of ignoramus untalented group of idiots, and one can guess why the whole realm of such debates goes nowhere and so irrelevant and unimportant to both science and religion.

Seriously, children/teenagers these days think that it's signficant to identifiy themselves as an atheist or Christian/God believer, the end result is that they completely exclude themselves to either domains; promiscuous and exploratory lifestyles and in addition no appreciation for science or intelligence. The end result that the majority of youngsters of this generation are dumber than ever, perhaps more political though.

Just a reminder, one does not become any smarter for believing or not believing in God. And no one has the smarts to challenge such claims purely by intellectual means. If they wish to teach God in school let them, the fact of the matter is children are not becoming any more scientifically accurate. There's really no distinction between science and religion, neither are superior, and teaching intelligent will not decrease your child's intellectual capacity. They're either dumb or smart as we know it.

 

[Evo]

The point GCT is that religion/God is not allowed to be taught in a public school, it is not ok, and it is especially not ok to try to pretend it is science in order to disguise it.

Teaching unscientific BS to children in a classroom as if it were backed up with facts is wrong. According to you, what children are taught in school makes no difference because they're either smart or dumb? Oh, you're right, let's just teach nothing but crap to our kids because it doesn't matter. :uhh:

 

[pattylou]

GCT,

Some members of these groups would also like geocentrism taught, as well as disclaimers that the Big Bang, plate tectonics, carbon dating, and so on, are "only theories." I don't think we have enough spare hours to add these things into our kids curricula.

I see you are a science advisor. This means you can tell me the 7 steps of the scientific method.

Intelligent design fails to address several of these steps. There is no specific testable and disprovable hypothesis. Also, we can not make a single prediction using "intelligent design."

If a so called "hypothesis" does not have a testable prediction, one that would allow the hypothesis to be disproven, then it is not science.

It would be like teaching the greek alphabet as equivalent to times tables in second grade math.

Show me the testable prediction that will allow us to disprove intelligent design, and I'll reconsider.

For the record, I don't recall claiming to be smarter than anyone.

 

[pattylou]

The guy running the petition is moving on to the next phase with this project. The site now says:

I need quotes immediately for the press release about this petition from notables in related fields. If you are, or are in contact with, someone appropriate please point them towards this page and them contact me.

I don't know if any of the people here feel they are qualified, or know someone qualified that they could pass this onto - but I thought I'd mention the request.

Contact info is at the link in the original post.