Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I was wondering why the wave-function in quantum mechanics is complex. There are a lot of threads in the physics section and I've downloaded a lot of papers, but they seem quite technical. So I'd like to examine the following idea (sorry if I use sloppy terms ;) ):

I have an orthonormal basis of vectors/functions which can be labeled with two indices [itex]f_{E,k}[/itex] and which are "two-dimensional". It's not just a column vector, but rather [itex]f_{E,k}(x,t)[/itex]. The vector algebra is undetermined (could be any linear algebra).

Now I have two conditions

[tex]k^2f_{E,k}+V(x,t)f_{E,k}=Ef_{E,k}[/tex]

[tex]\forall a: f_{E,k}(x+Ea,t+ka)=f_{E,k}(x,t)[/tex]

(btw, the second is in a way equivalent to [itex]E=mc^2[/itex])

Is it now possible to proof that the only orthonormal solution for this is a complex algebra with

[tex]f_{E,k}(x,t)=\exp(i(kx-Et))[/tex]?

Please add definitions (for scalar product and so on) as appropriate!

Or which other definitions/conditions do I need to get that complex solution uniquely?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Which algebra vectors satisfy this (Trying to derive Schrödinger)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**