Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Who Created God?

  1. Sep 13, 2004 #1
    So, how do we in fact get something from nothing, when in fact nothing is all there is? ... Nay, nor even the slightest potential for something. Wouldn't there at least have to be some sort of basic structure or matrix already there? If so, then how did that get there? Sounds to me like we're speaking about some basic structure which has always been, indeed, a highly intelligent structure. Which is to say, how else could it not be intelligent if, in fact it was the basis for all there is?

    Hey, did you know that consciousness is merely the end-result of that which is highly structured? Think about it. How could we possibly do anything, let alone think, without a tremendous amount of structure in our lives? Whereas if these immutable laws that govern this structure have always been, what might it possibly suggest? That the Universe has always been self-aware, and was designed specifically as an outcropping of this?

    Well, that certainly dispells any need to ask who created God now doesn't it? :wink:
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 13, 2004 #2
    It is my understanding that without matter, the material universe, there is no time or space; therefore, it is not appropriate or meaningful to speak of begining, end, before or after. Temporal words or thoughts have no meaning or reference where time does not exist. This of course is totally foriegn to us temporal beings who can think only sequentially and in cause then effect mode. To us if something exists now it must have had a beginning, a cause and eventually an end. We find it difficult if not impossible to wrap our mind around and accept the idea that something can have always been and always will be, without beginning and without end.
    While our material universe may have had a begining and thus an end the begining includes the beginning of time and space along with matter; it does not logically or necessarily follow the the creator and master must therefor have a beginning and end.
    Of course, as you suggest, it is not absolutely known nor is it necessary that the universe itself has a beginning or end. The so called Big Band Theory is only speculation, a hypothasis at best and should not be rightfully termed a theory. It is simply one philosophy that is currently widely accepted. Issac Asimov thought that possibly the universe was pulsating rather than expanding from a singularity forever or eventually fall back into the Big Crunch.
  4. Sep 13, 2004 #3
    sadly, it is an intuitive knowing that there is more to existence than just our physical existence that breeds 'ideas' about a god. this inner awareness can not be proven. ergo, no scientific acceptance.

    with QT we are glimpsing how our consciousness can reach out and can both effect our reality and affect our reailty (we create and change our reality). once we get a good handle on how this occurs, we will no longer need the olde, traditional myths about a god and all the biblical stories.

    i agree that the universe is more a state of consciousness (awareness - being) as opposed to just physical matter. it seems that 'energy' would be the our true essence and who the hell knows what the real 'god' will prove to be.

    olde drunk
  5. Sep 25, 2004 #4
    in my theory, god is merely a trick performed by our sub-consciousness in order to convince us that there CAN be god - *that is the ultimate and prime goal of mankind, our final destination*. think about it, GOD's ultimate power as described is the sum of our potential and our wishes, instincts.

    "once we get a good handle on how this occurs, we will no longer need the olde, traditional myths about a god and all the biblical stories."

    exactley. we won't NEED them anymore indeed, our CONSCIOUSNESS will slowly take over as we develop or evolve ourselves even further towards our goal. we won't need a commitional belief in a greater being, it will be kicked out by belief in our growing capabilities.

    it is like with imagination and creativity.
  6. Sep 25, 2004 #5
    so we will create god. or better, since god is timeless, we are already creating it and it is already created.
  7. Sep 25, 2004 #6
    hey, i think i just proved the existance of god:-)))))
  8. Oct 3, 2004 #7
    Why didn't we find answer related to the existence and creation of god?..
    One reason i feel is that perhaps we never asked right questions?
    We do agree that, in Science we can never find right answers unless we ask right questions?
    So to understand Existence of god ( unsolved mystery of world) i think we should change the approach of questioning or observing the phenomena.
    Reasoning and Imagination are inappropriate tool to prove or disapprove the existence of god/divine/super natural powers.
  9. Oct 3, 2004 #8
    "I am", is a truth.
    What "I am" is part of all there is.
    Lack of a part would mean non-esxistnece for the whole.
    Hence creation is a transmutation of its parts.

    Nothing created God. God is the alfa y omega.
    Everything that exists always existed.
    Creation transmutes transformation.
    Change changes the changed.

    Who created God is untenable.
    Ubiquitous has no place.
    Hence is everywhere.
    Therefore "I am".
  10. Oct 3, 2004 #9


    User Avatar

    Not neccessarily a trick performed by our sub-conciousness. What if religion and therefore God was created by humans as a law? this gives you moral values to think.

    The world as it's known as would be total chaos if there weren't any laws. A powerful law is religion, by no means I'm saying I believe in it, but think about it.

    Believing in God, just like the majority of our worldwide population does, prevents total chaos. More crimes would be commited if God wasn't suggested.


    I don't fully understand your point.


    I disagree. There are many reasons to not finding answers related to the existence and creation of God.

    For instance, one of the possible reasons for not finding any answers is because God doesn't even exist.


    What kind of tools are we suppose to use?


    Religion = Faith = no evidence for the existence of any religious moves and therefore God(s)
  11. Oct 3, 2004 #10


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    How about this. Many people are not comfortable without some kind of "Big Brother" in their lives. Some surrogate parents who will not go away and die like their physical parents, but stay with them all their lives, and be with them at death, rewarding them (somehow) when they are good and punishing them (somehow) when they're bad. Look around at the religionists you know. They are happy and comfortable because they have this idea in their heads, and they don't see how anyone can be happy and comfortable, let alone moral, without that idea in his head.
  12. Oct 3, 2004 #11
    How do we make that assumption, if everything thing that preceeds, is of the same essence? Time and space would be eternal. Why would matter, put a existential limit on time and space? I am interested to know why we come to the same conclusion for different reasons.

    If we assume this, then where and why would time, get the idea to move in a direction, towards natural perfection?

    Then you would assume that the Creator was not of the same essence as its creation?
  13. Oct 3, 2004 #12
    Might I suggest that God exists in the immaterial structure of thought, you know "ere" the Big Bang, from which the potential of everything has always existed?
  14. Oct 3, 2004 #13
    If so do you know of a son that was not of the father?
  15. Oct 3, 2004 #14
    We are all sons of the Father so to speak. I am not sure what you mean?
  16. Oct 3, 2004 #15


    User Avatar

    They don't even consider, let alone act, of God being a moral law. They just practise their religion and claim that everyone around them who do not have faith in a God are unhappy.

    I'm a christian. I believe in God but always saw the scientific way. I accept it and will always believe it.

    To me, when people say, who created God? my answer is scientific; The big bang.

    But it is at this point where things get really rusty because nor I and nor anybody else in this world will ever know whether men kind had powers that science has the power to provide or not.

    If the universe is infinite, so is everything. Just like succeeding, failing also counts as an infinite part of everything.

    Science tells you that. I in this case don't believe it.

    The universe is not infinite, for it an explosion created it, more or less like a gigantic bomb. It doesn't matter how big the bomb is, there will always be the core and the end of that bomb.

    Scientists claim that the sun is just a star. Fair enough, but what if the sun is the actual core of the big bang?

    There's more meaning than a simple star...
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2004
  17. Oct 3, 2004 #16
    I have gone down on record for consistently maintaining that, eternally, there is no relation that can be found between what constitutes the general term 'SOMETHING' and what constitutes the general term 'NOTHING'. If both exist, and can be proven so, then one must have always been without the other. If this is true, it is impossible to derive one from the other.
    I continue to maintain that:

    'Nothing', if it exists at all, cannot give rise to 'Something'

    'Something' remains what it has always been - 'Something' - and it can never decline into 'Nothing'

    'Something', if change is part of its nature or 'metaform', always changes from one thing to another, and never to 'Nothing'

    I think you should look at the Compositional or Informational Theory of Consciousness' for an alternative account. Defend it or deny it!

    The PRIME MOVER thesis argues that God created Himself/Herself/Itself! Look it up and defend it or deny it!
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2004
  18. Oct 3, 2004 #17
    But one fundamental Question remains, and it is the benchmark for every theory that makes claims in this very department:

    Can anything, regardless of how many times it can change, take a final unchangeable form?

    Or equivalently:

    Can a Physical thing, regardless of how many times it is able to change, finally survive physical destruction?

    Answering this question would be the highest point in the human intellectual pursuit.
  19. Oct 3, 2004 #18
    You can not get something out of nothing. Cause and Effect cannot be applied to God. God is outside of time.

    In our lives, we observe time. Since we are subject to Cause and Effect, we can trace things back to a Prime Mover, the first effect without a cause. We cannot say that God created time because he is outside of time. The only solution I can think of is that we are an aspect of God. We exsist as part of Him/It and never change. We cannot prove that we change. We only think we remember the past, are in the present, and therefore must have a future. As best as I can figure, we only exsist in the present and exsist thinking there is a past when there is not. For example, a man who is 90 thinks he has had 90 years of experience, when he only exsists as a 90 year old with 90 years worth of knowledge put inside him. I think Descartes had a similar theory. But in all, its kindof depressing thinking that all my past life is a lie. I could have sworn I actually wrote this post and not just had the experience of writing it planted in my head as I click submit
  20. Oct 4, 2004 #19


    User Avatar

    I like your theory.

    Could you expand it?

    I agree, God is out of time but doesn't mean he's just a story.

    The best solution I can think of is God being created after time, when all explosions occured and we know it as the universe.
  21. Oct 4, 2004 #20
    Answer 01=Only if all forms might be in the image and likeness of the final unchangeable form.

    Answer 02=All physical forms are of the same essence. We now know that all forms reduce down to relationships. Nothing is ever created or destroyed just transmuted.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook