1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Who else but pf could help me w/this prob.

  1. Mar 4, 2005 #1
    So a friend of a friend calls me with this Cal. I. prob. I try to figure it out and get stuck. I have already told her that I don't know how to solve it. Now I am reallllyy curious on how to solve it. Here it goes:

    You have a rectangular beam. Its cross-section has dimensions "l" and "w". The strength of the beam is directly proportional to w^2*l. Now if the beam is cut from a circular log with diameter of 3ft, what are the dimensions of the beam that will make it the strongest?

    So I said s(w,l)= k*w^2*l where "s" is the strength. The width must be a little less than 3ft...but here I am just guessing. I know that l*w is proportional to pi*r^2, but I don't know where to go from there. help
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 5, 2005 #2
    That question was confunsingly worded, but I think it means the rectangular section you can cut our from the circle.

    Hence, develop a formula for the dimensions of a circumscribed rectangle, then derive it.
  4. Mar 5, 2005 #3
    Yes! I can't relate the rectangle to the inscribed circle. How would one do that?
  5. Mar 5, 2005 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Draw a picture. If a rectangle is inscribed in a circle, then its diagonal is a diameter of the circle. Now use the Pythagorean theorem.
    Let R be the radius of the circle. If an inscribed rectangle has length and width, l and w, then [itex]l^2+ w^2= (2R)^2[/itex].
  6. Mar 5, 2005 #5
    I got w = 6/sqrt(5) and l= 3/sqrt(5). I said [tex] s(l,w) = w^2*l [/tex]. Where "s" was the strength. I took the partial derivative with respect to both "l" and "w". The partial w.r.t. "l" was [tex]w^2[/tex]. And the partial with respect to "w" was 2*l*w. I set both of these equal to zero. I did this to maximize the function. I don't think I was supposed to solve it this way because it is a problem from Cal. I. Anyway, I now have 2*l=w. I solved for "l" by the relationship that HallsofIvy told me to use. So [tex] l=sqrt(9-w^2)[/tex] gets substituted into l= w/2 and that's how I got w= 6/sqrt(5). It sounds reasonable, but I would like to know if I did it correctly.
  7. Mar 5, 2005 #6
    You could've used the fact that w^2 = (9-l^2)

    and just subed that directly into the equation.
  8. Mar 5, 2005 #7
    No, your answer is wrong :-) Follow double Mikes suggestion. There is no need for implcit differentiation
  9. Apr 1, 2005 #8
    Never did figure out this one.
  10. Apr 1, 2005 #9


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    You are given that the strength is s= kw l2 and you know that
    w2+ l2= 4R2 so l2= 4R2- w2 and s= 4kR2w- kw3.

    Differentiating with respect to w, s'= 4kR2- 3kw2= 0 at a critical value. That is, w2= (4/3)R2 so that [tex]w= \sqrt{\frac{4}{3}}R[/tex] and then l2= 4R2- (4/3)R2= (8/3)R2 and [tex]l= 2\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}R[/tex].

    l, you might notice, is not "w/2", it's w= l/2.
  11. Apr 1, 2005 #10
    Thats a tough problem for calc 1. Perhaps latex is just making it look really complicated.
  12. Apr 2, 2005 #11
    Thanx. Can rest easier now.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?