Was Shakespeare truly bored in mind when he wrote 'All the world's a stage'?

  • Thread starter Michael Dmitriyev
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the famous quote from W. Shakespeare, "All the world's a stage and men and women merely players," and its deeper meaning. The group discusses the significance of the quote being said by Shakespeare and how it may be interpreted in different contexts. They also discuss the idea of the world being a theater specifically constructed for one person and the limitations of the human mind in understanding the mysteries of the universe. Overall, the conversation delves into philosophical and existential themes surrounding the quote.
  • #1
Michael Dmitriyev
19
0
"Whole the world is the theater and we are actors on its scene".
I guess that words of W. Shekspire are more deeper then we are thinking and (it is possible) he was bored in mind.

Michael.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Michael Dmitriyev said:
"Whole the world is the theater and we are actors on its scene".
I guess that words of W. Shekspire are more deeper then we are thinking and (it is possible) he was bored in mind.

Michael.

it's just a simple analogy. not a clever one, but popular one. it is valuable because said by Sheakspeare. if it was said by J. Papalini - nobody would know that...
 
  • #3
That is also not exactly what Shakespeare said: looks like a translation into another language (Russian?) and then back again.

"All the world's a stage and men and women merely actors."
 
  • #4
0°0'0" said:
it's just a simple analogy. not a clever one, but popular one. it is valuable because said by Sheakspeare. if it was said by J. Papalini - nobody would know that...
If J.Papalini had said it to me, I would have thought it was a good analogy just as well.
 
  • #5
It's actually a pretty long analogy, or maybe more correctly, an extended metaphor, and I think it's quite chilling.
" Jaq. All the world’s a stage,
And all the men and women merely players: 148
They have their exits and their entrances;
And one man in his time plays many parts,
His acts being seven ages. At first the infant,
Mewling and puking in the nurse’s arms. 152
And then the whining school-boy, with his satchel,
And shining morning face, creeping like snail
Unwillingly to school. And then the lover,
Sighing like furnace, with a woful ballad 156
Made to his mistress’ eyebrow. Then a soldier,
Full of strange oaths, and bearded like the pard,
Jealous in honour, sudden and quick in quarrel,
Seeking the bubble reputation 160
Even in the cannon’s mouth. And then the justice,
In fair round belly with good capon lin’d,
With eyes severe, and beard of formal cut,
Full of wise saws and modern instances; 164
And so he plays his part. The sixth age shifts
Into the lean and slipper’d pantaloon,
With spectacles on nose and pouch on side,
His youthful hose well sav’d, a world too wide 168
For his shrunk shank; and his big manly voice,
Turning again toward childish treble, pipes
And whistles in his sound. Last scene of all,
That ends this strange eventful history, 172
Is second childishness and mere oblivion,
Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything." -source
He uses this elsewhere, in Macbeth's "Tomorrow, tomorrow, and tomorrow" soliloquy and in a couple sonnets.
Michael,
can you explain what you mean by "bored in mind"?
 
  • #6
Thanks for citing, honestrosewater. Obviously Shakespeare has related these words to physiological changes and connected to them the social roles of the person during his life.
I suggest to consider these words in the other context:
Whether really the world is the theatre which was constructed specially for the person playing?
 
  • #7
Michael Dmitriyev said:
I suggest to consider these words in the other context:
Whether really the world is the theatre which was constructed specially for the person playing?
You're talking about solipsism?
 
  • #8
"And then the whining school-boy, with his satchel,
And shining morning face, creeping like snail
Unwillingly to school. "
Anyone who doesn't find this a brilliant image, doesn't know what art is (or has forgotten what it is to be a boy).
 
  • #9
No. I am considering the world is really exist independently of human mind, but it has any sense for human only and appropriated namely for one.
If someone decide to build a house with a lot of equipment then this one suppose, or more precisely, he sure who'll live here. This equipment is incomprehensible and does not demand for anybody except of inhabitant to come.
 
  • #10
Michael Dmitriyev said:
I am considering the world is really exist independently of human mind, but it has any sense for human only and appropriated namely for one.
If someone decide to build a house with a lot of equipment then this one suppose, or more precisely, he sure who'll live here. This equipment is incomprehensible and does not demand for anybody except of inhabitant to come.
What you are trying to say - could it be similar to Einstein's thoughts here :

"The human mind is not capable of grasping the Universe. We are like a little child entering a huge library. The walls are covered to the ceilings with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written these books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. But the child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books---a mysterious order which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects."
A Einstein

In other words - the world seems rational and yet incomprehensible to humans. Humans look upon this incomprehensibility and wonder - was it designed this way, and why?

Alternatively, maybe it is simply the case that human minds are not sufficiently developed to comprehend all mysteries, and at the same time the human mind has evolved an ability to "jump to easy conclusions" when it cannot find a rational answer.

MF
:smile:
 

What is the "Whole the world is the" theory?

The "Whole the world is the" theory, also known as the Gaia hypothesis, proposes that the Earth is a self-regulating system that maintains conditions suitable for life.

How does the "Whole the world is the" theory explain the Earth's biodiversity?

According to the theory, the Earth's living organisms interact with each other and their environment to create a complex, interconnected system that supports and regulates life. This leads to a diverse range of species and habitats.

What evidence supports the "Whole the world is the" theory?

Some evidence for this theory includes the Earth's ability to maintain a relatively constant temperature and composition of atmospheric gases, as well as the intricate feedback loops between living organisms and their environment.

Are there any criticisms of the "Whole the world is the" theory?

Yes, there are some criticisms of this theory. Some argue that it anthropomorphizes the Earth and assigns it a level of consciousness and intentionality that may not be scientifically supported. Others point out that the Earth's self-regulation is not always beneficial for all species, as evidenced by natural disasters and extinction events.

How does the "Whole the world is the" theory impact our understanding of environmental issues?

This theory emphasizes the interconnectedness of all living things and the Earth's systems, highlighting the importance of considering the long-term effects of human actions on the environment. It also promotes a more holistic and collaborative approach to addressing environmental issues.

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
652
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
782
Replies
2
Views
80
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top