Why FADH but not NADH in brain ?

  • Thread starter crays
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Brain
In summary: However, NADH + H+ enters the brain through different pathways depending on the shuttle that is used. The glycerophosphate shuttle is less efficient than the malate-aspartate shuttle, but it is faster.
  • #1
crays
160
0
Hi, my book says that in the brain and skeletal muscle cells, it only yields a total of 36 ATP because NADH + H+ cannot enters the brain and skeletal muscle cells' mitochondria. But why FADH2 can is not stated. Can someone tell me why?

Also, since NADH + H+ is formed inside the mitochondria why would NADH + H+ cannot be used in the brain? They are still formed inside the mitochondria right?

Also, i would like to ask if my understanding is correct. NADH + H+'s H+ is used to push hydrogen against the concentration so that it will go through a gradient and ATP is synthesized from the ATP synthetase. Is this right?

Lots of question, thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Two NADH + H+ are produced during glycolysis, which occurs in the cytoplasm of cells. For the cell to use these molecules in oxidative phosphorylation (which occurs inside the mitochondria), the cell must have some way of transporting the "energy" stored by these cytoplasmic NADH + H+ into the mitochondria. There are two means by which this can occur, the glycerophosphate shuttle and the malate-aspartate shuttle.

The NADH and FADH2 molecules that are produced during the Krebs cycle do not have these problems as the Krebs cycle occurs in the mitochondrial matrix.

Yes, the energy from the NADH is used to push hydrogen against its concentration gradient. Proton gradient provides the energy for the ATP synthase enzyme to generate ATP.
 
  • #3
Thanks Ygggdrasil. one more question, in the glycolysis process. Does the WHOLE NADH + H+ enters the mitochondrian or just the electrons? or just the H+? Because they can only be changed to ATP in the mitochondria right?
 
  • #5
if its the electrons, why does the electrons choose FAD as it's carrier inside the mitochondria but not NAD+
 
  • #6
When the cell uses the malate-aspartate shuttle, the electrons from cytosolic NADH are transferred to mitochondrial NAD+. However, when the cell uses the glycerophosphate shuttle, the electrons from cytosolic NADH are transferred to mitochondrial FAD.

I'm not completely sure why cells have evolved and maintained the glycerophosphate shuttle as it is less energy efficient than the malate-aspartate shuttle. Perhaps the relevant issue is speed and the cell requires the combination of the two shuttles in order to transport the electrons from NADH quickly enough to meet demand (regeneration of NAD+ in the cytosol is important for glycolysis to continue).
 
  • #7
Thanks ygggdrasil, but do you have reading material like from wiki or anything to backup your statement that in the brain it uses the glycerophosphate shuttle? thanks~
 
  • #8
I don't know whether one mechanism is preferred or not in the brain.
 

1. Why is FADH preferred over NADH in the brain?

FADH is preferred over NADH in the brain because it is able to donate electrons to the electron transport chain at a lower energy level, which is necessary for the brain's high energy demands. Additionally, FADH is more efficient at producing ATP compared to NADH.

2. Can NADH still play a role in energy production in the brain?

Yes, NADH is still involved in energy production in the brain. It is responsible for carrying electrons to the electron transport chain, which is essential for the production of ATP.

3. Why is FADH not used in other parts of the body?

FADH is used in other parts of the body, but it is not the preferred electron carrier. NADH is more commonly used throughout the body for energy production.

4. Are there any disadvantages to using FADH in the brain?

There are no major disadvantages to using FADH in the brain. However, it is important to note that FADH is only able to donate electrons to the electron transport chain at a lower energy level, which means it produces less ATP compared to NADH.

5. Are there any health implications related to the use of FADH over NADH in the brain?

There are no major health implications related to the use of FADH over NADH in the brain. Both are essential for energy production and play important roles in brain function. Any changes in the levels of these molecules can have implications for overall brain health and function.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
14K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top