Why Is Zero Plural?

  • Thread starter skeptic2
  • Start date
1,747
51
Why is zero plural?

(eg. I have zero items on my agenda.)
 

Danger

Gold Member
9,564
244
You can't multiply by zero and obtain any result other than zero, it's still just zero. :biggrin:
 

Ivan Seeking

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,093
174
Why is zero plural?

(eg. I have zero items on my agenda.)
Is that a proper usage of the word "zero"?

We have no items.
We have a zero count.
 
Last edited:

tiny-tim

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
25,790
249
253
2
Taking a wild guess.....

A single object is singular.

A plural object is non-singular.

Zero, under this definition, will be a plural quantity.
 

Hurkyl

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,845
17
I would assume the grammatical constructs for "zero", "one", and "more than one" evolved long before we actually had numbers to express those ideas. Then, when we invented numbers, we simply inserted the numbers into the existing constructs.

Here's another one you might not have noticed.

It's easy to say "there are fourteen and two-thirds apples in that basket", right? Sounds quite natural.

Now, replace 14 2/3 with 1 2/3.



You probably said "there are one and two-thirds apples", but I suspect were a bit more hesitant.



Now, try 2/3.



You probably couldn't do it -- you had to switch to an entirely different construct: "there is two-thirds of an apple", or maybe "there are two-thirds of an apple", but you almost surely couldn't bring yourself to say "there are two-thirds apples" or "there is two-thirds apple".
 

tiny-tim

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
25,790
249
"there is two-thirds of an apple", or maybe "there are two-thirds of an apple", but you almost surely couldn't bring yourself to say "there are two-thirds apples" or "there is two-thirds apple".
There are two-thirds of an apple,

there is one-third of an apple,

but yes there are still no bananas. :wink:
 

George Jones

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,229
782
Last edited by a moderator:

Ivan Seeking

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,093
174
Re: zero bananas

Yes, we have no bananas

we have no bananas today! :wink:
Didn't you just make my point? Would we say that we have zero bananas?

There are zero loaves of bread, or no loaves of bread? As opposed to, we have a zero count.
 

dlgoff

Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,732
1,635

russ_watters

Mentor
18,979
5,137
Why is zero plural?

(eg. I have zero items on my agenda.)
Because if you had no (zero) item on your adjenda, you could still have several items on your adjenda.
 
6,171
1,275
Taking a wild guess.....

A single object is singular.

A plural object is non-singular.

Zero, under this definition, will be a plural quantity.
This makes sense: everything that is not singular is by default plural.
 

russ_watters

Mentor
18,979
5,137
Simple and satisfying, but according to the dictionary, wrong: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/plural
consisting of, containing, or pertaining to more than one.
Apparently, the real problem here is that we are speaking English:
Plural is a grammatical number....Languages having only a singular and plural form may still differ in their treatment of zero. For example, in English, German, Dutch, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese, the plural form is used for zero or more than one, and the singular for one thing only. By contrast, in French, the singular form is used for zero.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plural
 
4,660
5
Why is zero plural?

(eg. I have zero items on my agenda.)
Zero in the above example is an adjective, not a noun. In English, unlike other languages, adjectives do not change with declension or pleurality of noun.
zero alumni, zero alumnae, etc.
A pleural use of zero as a noun is: How many zeros does 1 trillion dollars have?
 
By your logic "1 trillion" is an adjective here?
It appears so. If you look up the definition of a number it gives the definition when refering to a number of things as an adjective. Makes sense.
 

ibnsos

By your logic "1 trillion" is an adjective here?

Wouldn't "1trillion" be the object? It isn't modifying the noun and I believe thats what adjectives do.
 
Wouldn't "1trillion" be the object? It isn't modifying the noun and I believe thats what adjectives do.
It is modifying the noun. Dollars being the noun it is describing the number of them.
 

ibnsos

It is modifying the noun. Dollars being the noun it is describing the number of them.
Duh, got ya. I was confusing subject with noun hehe. Think I did that in English class alot too.
 

tiny-tim

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
25,790
249
me bananas!

Hi George! :smile:
How do you tally no bananas?

I only tally me bananas. :wink:
Zero in the above example is an adjective, not a noun. In English, unlike other languages, adjectives do not change with declension or pleurality of noun.
zero alumni, zero alumnae, etc.
A pleural use of zero as a noun is: How many zeros does 1 trillion dollars have?
I think the strict answer is that zero should always be a noun, not an adjective …

all the natural numbers are adjectives, but they are written as numerals, with the same name, and a numeral is a noun :wink:

eg the number "one" is written as the numeral "1", with the name "one".

but the number "no" is written as the numeral "0", with the name "zero".
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MATLABdude

Science Advisor
1,646
4
You can pluralize zero:

The Kamikaze Zeros are to starboard!
Okay, not so much. In a similar fashion, there was some debate about what to call the first decade of this new millennium (in the same fashion as, say, the 20s and the 90s), and some suggested calling it the zeros. Never really caught on, so in the future, this decade might be the one that nobody ever talks about!
 

Related Threads for: Why Is Zero Plural?

  • Last Post
3
Replies
54
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
10K
  • Last Post
5
Replies
116
Views
14K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Top