Why KT phase transition is considered different from a second order phase transition?

  • Thread starter wdlang
  • Start date
  • #1
307
0
i cannot see the reason

what makes KT phase transition different from the ferro-para phase transition of the 2D ising model?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
atyy
Science Advisor
13,999
2,276


There is no local order parameter in the KT transition, so it's "topological" rather than "symmetry breaking".

http://www.itp.uzh.ch/~llucas/projects/proseminar.pdf [Broken]
http://www.phy.cuhk.edu.hk/course/2011-2012/1/phys5510/download/0/Ch11%20KT%20transition.pdf [Broken]
http://www.mit.edu/~levitov/8.334/notes/XYnotes1.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related Threads on Why KT phase transition is considered different from a second order phase transition?

Replies
6
Views
272
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
979
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
897
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
4K
Top