Why KT phase transition is considered different from a second order phase transition?

  • Thread starter wdlang
  • Start date
307
0
i cannot see the reason

what makes KT phase transition different from the ferro-para phase transition of the 2D ising model?
 

atyy

Science Advisor
13,547
1,639
Re: why KT phase transition is considered different from a second order phase transit

There is no local order parameter in the KT transition, so it's "topological" rather than "symmetry breaking".

http://www.itp.uzh.ch/~llucas/projects/proseminar.pdf [Broken]
http://www.phy.cuhk.edu.hk/course/2011-2012/1/phys5510/download/0/Ch11%20KT%20transition.pdf [Broken]
http://www.mit.edu/~levitov/8.334/notes/XYnotes1.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related Threads for: Why KT phase transition is considered different from a second order phase transition?

Replies
6
Views
165
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top