Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Why need to covarient formulation form of electrodynamics

  1. Dec 25, 2016 #1
    hello this is my first topic here and i hope good discussion or answer to my question

    As i understand the Maxwell equation keep its form in all frames so why i need to make a covarient formulation form of electrodynamics ?

    for example what the covarient form of continuity equation give me !
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 25, 2016 #2

    PeterDonis

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Welcome to PF! Please note that the thread levels ("B", "I", and "A") are meant to show the level of your background knowledge in the subject matter. Based on your post, I have changed the level of this thread to "B".

    Yes, provided we transform all quantities appropriately.

    I assume that by "covariant formulation" you mean a formulation in terms of 4-vectors and 4-scalars instead of 3-vectors and 3-scalars. The reason this is done is that it makes it much easier to transform all quantities appropriately, and to see explicitly how the laws remain invariant under Lorentz transformations.

    This is easily found by looking in textbooks or online resources. It is much too broad a subject for a PF thread; once you have taken some time to build your background knowledge, you should be able to ask a more specific question.
     
  4. Dec 25, 2016 #3
    thank you very much for quick answer

    my question about continuity equation not about the difference but i ask what i get from the covarient form instead of usual form (how i benefit from writing it in covarient form)

    also as you say that new formulation to make work much easier then if we use the ordinary (not modified equations) we will get the same results
    (i.e i use the same form of Maxwell equation in different frames )
     
  5. Dec 25, 2016 #4

    PeterDonis

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    I don't understand what you mean by this. Maxwell's Equations already take the same form in different frames, whether you use 3-vectors and 3-scalars or 4-vectors and 4-scalars to express them, as long as you transform between frames using the Lorentz transformations for all quantities. That's what you were saying in the OP when you said "the Maxwell equation keep its form in all frames".
     
  6. Dec 25, 2016 #5
    I meant by two forms the equations in attached photo (i meant covarience form and usual handing form)
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Dec 25, 2016 #6

    PeterDonis

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    These are two forms of the continuity equation, not Maxwell's Equations. The advantage of using the 4-vector form should be obvious.
     
  8. Dec 25, 2016 #7
    then the advantage of using 4- vector is just simplifying the transformation ??
     
  9. Dec 25, 2016 #8

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    You get two things. First, you get brevity. Second, by writing it in covariant form you can immediately use any coordinates you like. For instance, suppose you want to use Maxwell's equations in spherical coordinates. The covariant form allows you to immediately use the same laws as you normally would use.
     
  10. Dec 25, 2016 #9

    PeterDonis

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    And making the Lorentz invariance more explicit, because the covariant quantities are always just one symbol; in the continuity equation, you have just ##J^a## instead of having to remember that the pair ##\rho, \vec{J}## go together.
     
  11. Dec 25, 2016 #10
    then the covariant form is that which keep its form under transformation (is that which is invariant)
     
  12. Dec 25, 2016 #11

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes, that is what covariant means in this context.
     
  13. Dec 25, 2016 #12

    but the density (rho) is still exist as a temporal component of the current denisty
     
  14. Dec 25, 2016 #13
    Also could i think that covariance is the generalization of electrodynamic laws in diffrent frames ?
     
  15. Dec 25, 2016 #14

    PeterDonis

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    If you are using the 3-vector form of the equation, there is no "temporal component of the current density", because there is no "current density" 4-vector. There is just the charge density ##\rho## and the current density 3-vector ##\vec{J}##. And they just happen to get mixed up together in Lorentz transformations.
     
  16. Dec 25, 2016 #15
    it seems that i benefit from this discussion ,, i dont want to waste your time more than that but i want to thank u for your time .. i will read more and may return to ask you again ,,, deep thanks
     
  17. Dec 25, 2016 #16

    PeterDonis

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    You're welcome!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted