Why no 'Big Crunch' a femtosecond after Big Bang ?

  • Thread starter fastartcee
  • Start date
  • #1

Main Question or Discussion Point

Why no 'Big Crunch' a femtosecond after "Big Bang"?

When the Universe was the size of a grapefruit, with the mass of 100 billion galaxies (actually, 20 times that mass, I suppose, given dark matter and dark energy), why did it not instantly suffer gravitational collapse into a megamega black hole?

After all, nothing (except Hawking radiation?) escapes from a puny black hole with the mass of only 100 million Suns or so.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,250
2
The most honest answer is that is just not what the equations of cosmology predict will happen.

If you want to rationalize it, perhaps say that in the beginning the universe was expandind faster than gravity could catch up ( expansion has unlimited "velocity", gravity goes the speed of light).
 
  • #3
SpaceTiger
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,940
2
fastartcee said:
When the Universe was the size of a grapefruit, with the mass of 100 billion galaxies (actually, 20 times that mass, I suppose, given dark matter and dark energy), why did it not instantly suffer gravitational collapse into a megamega black hole?
You can think of the Big Bang as a "kick" of sorts. In the classical approximation, the answer is that the universe had enough kinetic energy to keep expanding, despite the force of gravity. That's not entirely correct in the general relativistic way of looking at things, but the idea is the same.

As to how it got that initial kick, nobody knows. If the big bang theory is true, then we may never know.
 

Related Threads on Why no 'Big Crunch' a femtosecond after Big Bang ?

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
3K
Top