Why not?

Main Question or Discussion Point

Question: Why aren't humans evolving? I know this might sound stupid, and I can see the progression from caveman to common day man, but we have lived, looking kind of the same, for sooo many years?(please correct me if I'm wrong

Are the people who have scientific mysteries with their bodies the ones who are evolving?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

2,903
13
You have to wait millions of years.

Shor term, you can look at all the inter-racial people of the world.
 
1,424
1
Because, so far, our intelligence has allowed us to trump evolution, giving to everyone more or less the same chances of passing on his or her genes. There can't be evolution without enough pressure for it to happen.
 
334
0
I saw some (journalist's summary of a) study that suggested that a person that is the ancestor of every living human being could have lived as early as the end of the ice age. Assuming some veracity to that and that that person came from a homogeneous group of people, that's a lot of evolving we've done. However, I don't think humans will evolve too much farther because there is already a lot of interracial marriage which tends to bring the races together. Brasil is a good example.

Edited for clarity
 
Last edited:
854
16
russ_watters
Mentor
19,016
5,168
You have to wait millions of years.

Shor term, you can look at all the inter-racial people of the world.
Well, thousands anyway.

But we are taller than people just a few hundred years ago. That's mostly a matter of nutrition, though.
 
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,329
1,940
We are evolving.

Evolution is very difficult to see on a human timescale. You have to see it on the scale of hundreds or thousands of generations.

We are taller than we were a few thousand years ago, we have cross-breeding happening everywhere, we have genetic mutations that are becoming more and more common in the population (suggesting that those particular mutations are not harmful.)
 
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,329
1,940
2,903
13
Im tall. Evolution works!! I am biologically superior to you peons.
 
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,329
1,940
Sickle cell anemia (mostly in African races) making for a partial immunity to malaria is a common beneficial mutation cited.
 
Moonbear
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,349
51
However, I don't think humans will evolve too much farther because there is already a lot of interracial marriage which tends to bring the races together. Brasil is a good example.
Short of extinction, a species never stops evolving. Changes are always happening; they don't need to be huge and obvious to the naked eye to be part of evolutionary processes.
 
38
165
We still have an affinity for violence that is probably not necessary for survival anymore.
I hope we don't have to go through thousands of years to get rid of that trait.
 
lisab
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,832
616
You're judging evolution based on just physical appearance. I don't know much about biology, but I think the genetics that determine how we look are a very, very small part of our total genetic make-up.

Think of all the microbes that assault our species every day - MRSA, flu, HIV, on and on. Some unlucky people die from these infections, some get sick but don't die - there's natural selection, right there.
 
686
0
However, I don't think humans will evolve too much farther because there is already a lot of interracial marriage which tends to bring the races together. Brasil is a good example.
I'm not understanding why that would stop anything.

Moreover, as someone pointed out, we no longer care about superior traits like nature does in the wild. Today, people who are born disabled or otherwise "inferior" (say naturally shy or small-statured) still have a good change of having kids. The miracle of Society!
 
russ_watters
Mentor
19,016
5,168
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,329
1,940
I'm not understanding why that would stop anything.

Moreover, as someone pointed out, we no longer care about superior traits like nature does in the wild. Today, people who are born disabled or otherwise "inferior" (say naturally shy or small-statured) still have a good change of having kids. The miracle of Society!
Your term "superior" is subjective and only meaningful in context. In the human eco-system, able-bodied is not a survival trait.
 
68
0
Question: Why aren't humans evolving? I know this might sound stupid, and I can see the progression from caveman to common day man, but we have lived, looking kind of the same, for sooo many years?(please correct me if I'm wrong

Are the people who have scientific mysteries with their bodies the ones who are evolving?
Mainly evolving is for addapting to are sorrounding's... for example if you were to breed 5 gen's of people in 0gravity in space, are heads would expand and we would start evolving to addapt to are new sorrounding's.. mainly the it's what drive's the need for change for self presaverance of are self's and collectivly.
 
686
0
Your term "superior" is subjective and only meaningful in context. In the human eco-system, able-bodied is not a survival trait.
Being tall isn't a superior trait? Okay, hot-shot, remind me about that next time you can't reach something on the top shelf.
 
68
0
Being tall isn't a superior trait? Okay, hot-shot, remind me about that next time you can't reach something on the top shelf.
The Information form the DNA could not create its self to its preset from, because of the lack of Folic acid's in there diet's, mainly dark-greens, vegetables, liver, dried beans and pea's are primary source's, and they lacked them which leads to a deficiency disorder which would create stunted growth (especially of the fetus during pregnancy and of infant's) that's one of meany reason's why they lacked are fine looks :)
 
Math Is Hard
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,491
28
Being tall isn't a superior trait? Okay, hot-shot, remind me about that next time you can't reach something on the top shelf.
Long and lean builds aren't so good for those dwelling in very cold climates.
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_091.html

Eskimos are compactly built, which minimizes loss of body heat. The average Eskimo's height is only about 5'2", and most of that consists of a massive torso. The lower portions of their arms and legs are shorter than the upper halves, and their hands and feet are distinctly petite. That means they don't lose a lot of heat through their extremities, which are most vulnerable to the cold.
 
686
0
lisab
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,832
616
Being tall isn't a superior trait? Okay, hot-shot, remind me about that next time you can't reach something on the top shelf.
And you remind me the next time you bump your head or walk into a spider web :eek: .
 
854
16
Being tall isn't a superior trait? Okay, hot-shot, remind me about that next time you can't reach something on the top shelf.
I alway get a tall person to reach for me. They're the first to know if it's raining and the last to know if there's a flood.
 
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,329
1,940
Mainly evolving is for addapting to are sorrounding's... for example if you were to breed 5 gen's of people in 0gravity in space, are heads would expand and we would start evolving to addapt to are new sorrounding's.. mainly the it's what drive's the need for change for self presaverance of are self's and collectivly.
It's considered very bad netiquette to criticize spelling and grammar but your posts are almost illegible. Is English not your native language?

(And just to keep it on-topic, skill in communication is a survival trait. :biggrin: )
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: Why not?

  • Last Post
3
Replies
61
Views
19K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
498
  • Last Post
4
Replies
83
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Last Post
12
Replies
298
Views
63K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
4
Replies
97
Views
11K
Top