Why the Carnot cycle is not used with real engines?

In summary: Carnot cycle is not used with real engines because it is physically impossible for there to be a temperature gradient for heat transfer.
  • #1
electric_head_uk
5
0
I have a question on Why the Carnot cycle is not used with real engines? I need to refer to real cycles in my explanation.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Carnot cycle uses the same temperature for heat transfer something that is physically impossible(there needs to be a temperature gradient for heat transfer).
 
  • #3
That isn't really true. The carnot cycle does operate between two temperature sinks.

The carnot cycle is merely a cycle which assumes that there is no increase in entropy due to imperfections. It is useful because it is the pinnacle of thermodynamic cycles and it can tell you thinks like the maximum efficiency any cycle can reach when operating between two given temperatures. It isn't used because it cannot be achieved, it just isn't possible.

However, the stirling cycle is implementable and has a maximum theoretical efficiency which matches the carnot cycle. Stirling engines are used in a few applications, like a stirling cryocooler, successfully. However, it is generally more practical to use mechanical devices which run on other cycles like an Otto cycle (automobile) for example.
 
  • #4
I know there are two different temperatures but the heat transfer takes place isothermally which is physically impossible.
So that is different than isentropic because no imperfections which off course is a requirement that also needs to be met.

There is isothermal expansion, adiabatic expansion, isothermal compression, adiabatic compression. I should have stated more clearly that there IS a heat source and sink which are at different temperatures.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
The heat transfer can take place at one temperature if it is a saturated liquid vapor mixture. But you are correct, if the cycle is for a single phase fluid it also cannot happen.
 
  • #6
These are always interesting discussions. However, even do a saturated liquid can absorb heat isothermally, there still needs to be some kind of gradient at its boundary to get the energy into the saturated system, whether heats enters through conduction, convention or through some radiative means. Holding a source against the body of interest at equal temperature simply will not produce any flow of heat. Even in theory this would happen at an infinitesimally small pace. That is why Carnot cycles cannot operate in real life.
 
  • #7
As stated in post 3, the defining characteristic of the Carnot cycle is the lack of a change in entropy through the different processes. This isn't just a matter of friction in parts, but there is entropy lost due to the behavior of the working fluid itself.
 
  • #8
Hi there:

Here are a few plots regarding the Carnot Cycle operation and usefulness.

Slide21.GIF


Slide22.GIF


Slide23.GIF


Thanks,

Gordan
 

What is the Carnot cycle and why is it not used with real engines?

The Carnot cycle is a theoretical thermodynamic cycle that is used as a benchmark for the maximum efficiency of a heat engine. It consists of four reversible processes: isothermal expansion, adiabatic expansion, isothermal compression, and adiabatic compression. It is not used with real engines because it is an idealized model that assumes no friction, perfect insulation, and no internal irreversibilities, which are not possible in real-world systems.

What are the main limitations of the Carnot cycle?

The main limitations of the Carnot cycle are its assumptions of ideal conditions, such as perfect insulation and no internal irreversibilities. In real engines, there will always be some amount of energy loss due to friction and heat transfer, making it impossible to achieve the theoretical maximum efficiency of the Carnot cycle.

Why do real engines have lower efficiencies than the Carnot cycle?

Real engines have lower efficiencies than the Carnot cycle because they are subject to various sources of energy loss, such as friction, heat transfer, and internal irreversibilities. These factors reduce the amount of useful work that can be obtained from the engine, leading to lower efficiency compared to the idealized Carnot cycle.

How does the Carnot cycle compare to other thermodynamic cycles used in real engines?

The Carnot cycle is used as a benchmark for the maximum efficiency of a heat engine. It is often compared to other thermodynamic cycles, such as the Otto, Diesel, and Brayton cycles, which are commonly used in real engines. These cycles have their own advantages and limitations, and they are designed to operate under real-world conditions, unlike the idealized Carnot cycle.

Is there any practical application of the Carnot cycle in real engines?

While the Carnot cycle is not used in real engines, it still has practical applications in other areas, such as refrigeration and air conditioning systems. These systems use a modified version of the Carnot cycle, known as the reverse Carnot cycle, to achieve maximum efficiency. However, in real engines, other thermodynamic cycles are more suitable for practical applications due to their ability to operate under real-world conditions.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
950
Replies
1
Views
757
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
550
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
531
Back
Top