Why this doesn't work?

Hi,

Could anyone tell me why http://optionalreaction.com/articles/ghd/index.htm [Broken] doesn't work?

Many thanks in advance (this problem has been bothering me for a long time),
Keith
 
Last edited by a moderator:

arildno

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,948
130
Because it is nonsense?
 
What is nonsense?
 

brewnog

Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,701
7
This discovery has been made available to the universe in the hope that it will help ease the pain and suffering of those who are victims of the universe.
That is nonsense.
 
I guess you guys have no sense of humour here?

I have had 1 (7 point) warning, and two unintelligent replies.

Cya
 

arildno

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,948
130
In addition, you've got a dumb website.
Goodbye.
 

DaveC426913

Gold Member
18,252
1,857
optionalreaction said:
I guess you guys have no sense of humour here?
Sense of humour. OK, so it's a joke. And you were hoping to dupe others into making serious replies?

Cya
 

russ_watters

Mentor
18,849
5,039
optionalreaction said:
Hi,

Could anyone tell me why http://optionalreaction.com/articles/ghd/index.htm [Broken] doesn't work?

Many thanks in advance (this problem has been bothering me for a long time),
Keith
Just in case you're serious, do the math. Its pretty straightforward that if f=ma then ma=f. You flipped an equation over and somehow got a different answer doing it one way than the other way!

edit: IIRC, I first learned f=ma in 8th grade physical science class coincident with geometry/trigonometry. This problem is a simple sliding-on-a-frictionless-incline problem and a piece of cake for a halfway competent 8th grader. That 8th grader would probably laugh at your website's claim. So its tough to expect that real engineers would give you any more than a dismissive "that's nonsense".
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FredGarvin

Science Advisor
5,050
6
The release of this information (November 2002) will stop any patents.
That was my favorite part.
 

Janus

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,396
1,074
To start off, how do you justify your claim that:

Accelerating a ball balanced on a 45 degree slope needs only ~62.5% of the energy needed to directly accelerate a ball of equal mass.
 

Related Threads for: Why this doesn't work?

Replies
2
Views
782
Replies
27
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top