1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why zero?

  1. Dec 26, 2015 #1

    {~}

    User Avatar

    Why do we have the number zero? What makes it important? Can we create math like system that don't use zero but are nonetheless useful. What limits or biases does having or not having zero create when we do science?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 26, 2015 #2
    Calculus would be hard without the limit as stuff goes to zero.
     
  4. Dec 26, 2015 #3

    Svein

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    • Number representations would be hard (just try do do calculations in the roman number system which has no zero)
    • Group theory (and everything based on it) would not exist
    • Since equality is defined as "difference equals zero" in several mathematical systems, equality would be hard to define
    ... and so on.
     
  5. Dec 27, 2015 #4

    jambaugh

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    One way to define numbers in a pragmatic, constructive way is as actions. This especially gives you meaning for the negatives. For example the number +3 indicates incrementing in the positve direction 3 steps, -3 is the reverse action and 0 is the identity, the do-nothing action. The zero is necessary for completeness when numbers are used in this way (as elements of a group under addition). It is in fact referred to as the additive identity for this reason.
     
  6. Dec 27, 2015 #5

    symbolipoint

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor
    Gold Member

    God gave us the Whole Numbers. He did not give us zero because he did not need to. Humans are smart enough to find what zero means, using our own efforts.
     
  7. Dec 27, 2015 #6

    PeroK

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I'd say 0 is a lot more important than, say, 362. It would be easier to get rid of that one.

    When did you last look for ##f(x) = 362##?
     
  8. Dec 27, 2015 #7

    PeroK

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    If you didn't have 0, then I guess every football match would have to start at 1-1? Who would be credited with scoring those goals?
     
  9. Dec 27, 2015 #8

    {~}

    User Avatar

    What good is the additive identity in symbolic math? Is it actually necessary? Why cant our number system be based on multiplication rather than addition and use 1 as the identity to which transformations are made to get other numbers? I think I read somewhere that that would work under group theory. Why does group theory require zero?

    What does it mater which number the football game starts at? If it is the same number isn't it still a fair match?
     
  10. Dec 27, 2015 #9

    Samy_A

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Rings, fields, vector spaces need aan additive identity.

    While anecdotical, this example shows that without 0, you have to devise tricks for the simplest of things,
     
  11. Dec 27, 2015 #10

    PeroK

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    What world are you living in that you want to replace addition with multiplication? They are different you know!

    Back to football, if you start at 1 and multiply by 1 every time you score a goal, the score would always be 1-1. There's a certain fairness in that, I guess.
     
  12. Dec 27, 2015 #11

    Svein

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    It does not, You can create a group using multiplication as the operation - but you will soon run into problems. First - you cannot use the integers, since that would not give you an inverse, You have to use the rationals - and you will run into a lot of problems. But feel free to try!
     
  13. Dec 27, 2015 #12

    WWGD

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    No number system using addition would be closed under it : how would you define a-a in such system? It may be an interesting exercise to show that
    0 (the right type of 0 object) is the only viable definition for the expression a-a.
     
  14. Dec 27, 2015 #13

    symbolipoint

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor
    Gold Member

    ....And God created zero and permitted man to discover it, and this pleased God that it was good.
     
  15. Dec 27, 2015 #14

    WWGD

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Would you please leave the religious references for....a religious forum?
     
  16. Dec 27, 2015 #15

    Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    I'm pretty sure symbolipoint is speaking tongue in cheek...
     
  17. Dec 27, 2015 #16

    WWGD

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Ah, good deal, my non-religious refuge here at PF is safe, phew.
     
  18. Dec 27, 2015 #17

    symbolipoint

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor
    Gold Member

    My higher-level human feelings were active on this, so what I said was not any quotation from religious sources. The remark I made comes from the sometimes quoted statement that God gave us the integers,...
     
  19. Dec 27, 2015 #18

    pwsnafu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    "God made the integers, all else is the work of man."
    Leopard Kronecker, 1886
     
  20. Dec 27, 2015 #19
    The integers I use were made by Peano just a couple of years after Kronecker wrote that.
     
  21. Dec 27, 2015 #20

    WWGD

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Isn't Kronecker one of the Mathematicians that pushed Cantor to a breakdown because of his insults and accusations?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Why zero?
Loading...