Can a high-compression engine run on low octane fuel without knocking?

In summary: When I switched to 18 degrees the engine was knocking. With 18 degrees I've been able to run the engine at around 11,000 rpm without any knocking. I've tried 11,500 and 12,000 rpm and the engine knocks at those speeds. I'm thinking the engine is just too torque hungry for my driving style.In summary, it is possible to design a direct injection gasoline engine with a compression ratio of 13:1 or around that much, without knocking, by using fuel of low octane number. However, the maximum compression ratio is closer to something like 10:1 or 11:1 depending on timing advance. There are already direct injection engines achieving what you're talking about, although the ones I've seen do specify premium fuel
  • #1
jethead
11
0
Can a direct injection petrol engine of compression ratio 13:1, or around that much, be designed to run on fuel of low octane number, say about 87, without knocking? I think it is possible if the fuel is injected just at the end of the compression stroke like in a diesel engine. Is there such an engine?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Just look for the label "GDI" on any new vehicle.

GDI= Gasoline Direct Injection
 
  • #3
Yeah. But what I'm wondering is this:
87 octane number fuel can be used for a maximum compression ratio of 7:1 or so. Any higher compression and it'll require higher octane fuel. Could 87 RON gasoline be used in an engine that has 13:1 compression ratio without engine knocking? My thoughts- YES! With properly timed direct injection like in a diesel engine.
 
  • #4
jethead said:
87 octane number fuel can be used for a maximum compression ratio of 7:1 or so.

That sounds a bit low to me, I think the maximum compression is closer to something like 10:1 or 11:1 depending on timing advance.

Still, that's a rule of thumb for a conventional fuel injected engine, not a direct-injection one. There are already direct injection engines achieving what you're talking about, although the ones I've seen do specify premium fuel:

Audi USA said:
Arrangement Front mounted, longitudinal

Bore 3.37 in. [92.8 mm]

Type 3.2 liter DOHC V6 gasoline engine with FSI direct injection and Audi valvelift system

Stroke 3.65 in. [85.5 mm]

Displacement 3.2 liter [195.1 cu. in., 3197 cc]

Fuel Requirement Premium unleaded

Compression Ratio 12.5:1

Horsepower 270 hp @ 6500 rpm

Torque 243 lbs. ft. @ 3000 rpm
http://models.audiusa.com/q5/detailed-specifications?engine=66
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Toyota makes naturally-aspirated conventionally-injected engines with 10.0:1 compression ratios which run on regular unleaded (at decreased power). Notice the power difference isn't much between regular and premium though:

Wikipedia said:
The 1GR-FE is the 4.0 L (3956 cc) version, designed for longitudinal mounting in RWD and 4WD pickup applications ... Output is 236 hp at 5200 rpm with 266 lb·ft of torque at 4000 rpm on 87 octane, and 239 hp at 5200 rpm with 278 lb·ft at 3700 rpm on 91 octane. This engine features Toyota's VVT-i, variable valve timing system on the intake cam and a compression ratio of 10.0:1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_GR_engine#1GR-FE
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Thanks Mech. I believe it's possible after all.
 
  • #7
you can take a 13 to one engine and run it on lower octane fuel ...i have done it and no detonation...here is general rule of thumb..
compression ratio denotes octane...there are a lot of side issues like effective cylinder pressure, cam timing ( lift duration opening and closing ramps..) scavenging, fuel- air density, fuel droplet syspension..etc...

in general,,if yo u have a 9 to 1 compression engine, you can add one point of compression if you replace an iron cylinder head with aluminum...now we are at 10 to 1
if you plumb outside cold air to intake ..add another point to the CR..now we are at 11 to 1
if you go to quench technology on the piston to cylinder head area ..add another 1 point so we are at 12 to 1 where i stopped modifcation..i did use latest CD ignition...ran this 493 cid engine on pump gasoline...never any pinging or sign of detonation and my trips into 7000 rpm plus range...with proper fuel injection and fuel air management I think 13 to 1 is possible...old NASCAR iron monsters over 420 cid ran 14 to 15 to 1 CR...effective ( once engine was fully up to op temperatures..water.. oil ) effective CR being key word here
but...you have to know what you are doing

btw ..todays Pro Stock drag engine are running 16 to 1 CR
if you are running a stock engine..not purpose built...

PUMP FUEL

8.5:1- Non-quench head road use standard sedan, without knock sensor.

8.5:1- Quench head engine for tow service, motorhome and truck.

9.0:1- Street engine with proper .040" quench, 200° @ .050" lift cam, iron head, sea level operation.

9.5:1- Same as 9:1 except aluminum head used.

Light vehicle and no towing.

10:1- Used and built as the 9.5:1 engine with more than 220° @ .050" lift cam. A knock sensor retard is recommended with 10:1engines.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Very encouraging! With intake air and fuel cooling, it's definitely going to work.
 
  • #9
With VVT the camshaft timing changes the true compression ratio. The static CR can be what ever you want it to be- the bigger the cam, the more static CR you NEED because the true CR drops with the early/ late valve timing of a huge cam. Unfortunately, the driver comfort of a big cam- and the emissions- suffer greatly.
 
  • #10
I've run 8 pounds of boost on a 7.4 to 1 with 87 octane (dished pistons...no quench) and 10 pounds of boost on a 8.5 to 1 with 93 octane (high quench setup) for about 30,000 miles each.

My initial timing was 20 degrees.
 

1. Will such an engine work?

The answer to this question depends on the specific details of the engine in question. It is possible for an engine to work, but it would require careful design, engineering, and testing to ensure its functionality.

2. How does this engine differ from traditional engines?

This engine may differ from traditional engines in terms of its design, fuel source, and overall functionality. It may also have unique features or components that set it apart from other engines.

3. Is there any existing research or prototypes of this type of engine?

There may be existing research or prototypes of this type of engine, as scientists and engineers are constantly exploring new technologies and methods for propulsion. However, it is important to note that each engine is unique and may have different levels of success and feasibility.

4. What are the potential benefits of using this type of engine?

The potential benefits of using this type of engine may include increased efficiency, reduced emissions, and new possibilities for transportation and space exploration. However, these benefits would need to be carefully evaluated and tested before they can be fully realized.

5. Are there any potential drawbacks or limitations to this type of engine?

Like any new technology, there may be potential drawbacks or limitations to this type of engine. These could include cost, reliability, safety concerns, and compatibility with existing infrastructure. Further research and development would be needed to address and overcome these challenges.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
177
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
11
Views
19K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
981
Back
Top