- #1

insertnamehere

- 50

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter insertnamehere
- Start date

- #1

insertnamehere

- 50

- 0

- #2

quantumdude

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 5,575

- 23

So since you know that [itex]v_1=\lambda_1f_1[/itex] and [itex]v_2=\lambda_2f_2[/itex], so what can you say about the wavelengths?

- #3

insertnamehere

- 50

- 0

v= sqrt(T/linear density) and also (wavelength/tension)

and increasing the mass of the string will have no affect on the tension, v increases as the tension remains constant, therefore will the wavelength have to INCREASE in order to compensate the equation? Am i on the right track?

- #4

quantumdude

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 5,575

- 23

insertnamehere said:v= sqrt(T/linear density) and also (wavelength/tension)

The first part is right, but the second part is not. v does not equal (wavelength/tension). That expression doesn't even have the right units to be a speed.

and increasing the mass of the string will have no affect on the tension, v increases as the tension remains constant, therefore will the wavelength have to INCREASE in order to compensate the equation? Am i on the right track?

The wave speed

- #5

insertnamehere

- 50

- 0

oh no, i meant v= (wavelength/PERIOD)

Share:

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 563

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 319

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 454

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 473

- Replies
- 18

- Views
- 565

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 109

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 367

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 473

- Last Post

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 678

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 322