Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Wiltshire cosmology

  1. Feb 16, 2007 #1

    Kea

    User Avatar

    People might be interested in a new paper, namely

    Cosmic clocks, cosmic variance and cosmic averages
    David L. Wiltshire
    72 pages, 5 figures
    http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0702082

    which demolishes DE (yet again!).
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 17, 2007 #2

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award

    I like the paper, it is well written as usual [he has a way with words]. But the conclusions are not convincing. The treatment of SNIa data, for example, appears to be dismissive, IMO.
     
  4. Feb 26, 2007 #3

    Kea

    User Avatar

    comment from D. Wiltshire

    DLW wishes to advise that the statement that the treatment of SNIa data, for example, appears to be dismissive would seem to have been made without reading all of the paper, which is understandable given it is 72 pages long. In view of the length of the paper, he has placed a summary of observational results and a faq at

    http://www2.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/~dlw24/universe/

    In relation to the supernova data, see Figs 2 and 3, surrounding discussion and section 7.5. Apparent acceleration is now obtained, unlike in the rough approximations of earlier work. Moreover, the goodness of fit is now statistically indistinguishable from the Lambda CDM model. (Further details will be released in a paper with Leith and Ng, ref [16].) For those who wish to actually pay attention to data, the question of whether or not the "Hubble bubble" should be included (a difference between Riess04 and Riess06 gold data sets), is a serious issue for the Lambda CDM paradigm, as the supernovae data teams have pointed out (in a quiet way) in their recent eprints astro-ph/0612666, astro-ph/0701041. This feature has a natural explanation in the FB model, as discussed in section 7.5, and should ultimately be open to quantitative testing. The difference of the residuals between the Lambda CDM models and the FB model in Fig. 3 also indicate that supernovae data may prove to be a good way to distinguish the models once some thousands or tens of thousands of data points are collected, even though the present data cannot distinguish the two models.
     
  5. Feb 28, 2007 #4

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award

    Point conceded. I did not fully appreciate the implications suggested in this passage during my initial reading. Will give the paper a more careful reading [I do tend to gloss at times].
     
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2007
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Wiltshire cosmology
  1. Cosmological curvature (Replies: 27)

Loading...