Harnessing Wind Energy From a Car for Fuel Efficiency

In summary, an increase in drag would lead to an increase in fuel consumption, while an increase in power would not overcome the increase in drag.
  • #1
ArielRodriguez
6
0
First of all, I have read some of the previous posts that related to this topic, but they are closed.

I am not looking to solve the world's energy crisis, but I was wondering if there was a way to harness some of the energy given off as friction from the drag of a car. I was looking at some of the embellishments on my excursion (clearly not made to be aerodynamic), and I found that there were several different grooves that could easily be made into something like a wind tunnel. So, my question is whether it would increase the drag to cut the ends open and install a small turbine, more so than it could create.
Please keep in mind that fact that there is already a preexisting body where it would be, so to simply say "it's impossible due to conservation of energy" is not helpful nor necessarily true.
EDIT: I may not have been clear enough as to what I was trying to ask. I would use the turbine as a generator for energy, to be used in the engine in some form or another. Specifically, I was looking at adding a unit that created Hydrogen from water, to enhance the gas and make the car more fuel efficient. But, being that cars are dreadfully inefficient, would it even be worth it in the end? That is, in the sense of energy, not dollars.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ArielRodriguez said:
I am not looking to solve the world's energy crisis, but I was wondering if there was a way to harness some of the energy given off as friction from the drag of a car.
If there is no true wind (relative to the ground), I don't think this makes sense for cars.

But airplanes, have to create lift, which induces vortices. And this specific loss form can be harvested with wind tip turbines (slide 21):
http://www.dept.aoe.vt.edu/~mason/Mason_f/WingtipDevicesS04.pdf
But it is probably simpler to use winglets and other shapes that reduce the vortices in the first place.

Another way for planes to recover energy lost to drag are boundary-layer ingestion engines. The body accelerates the air, and the engines recover some of that kinetic energy by working more efficiently, than in the freestream.
http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/AW_09_30_2013_p40-619758.xml

As for ground vehicles, they can use the true wind relative to the ground to propel themselves. To go directly upwind, they need a turbine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7PNSyAfCjk
 
  • #3
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Fair enough. I hadn't seen that particular post, which would have saved me quite a bit of time...
 
  • #5
ArielRodriguez said:
Fair enough. I hadn't seen that particular post, which would have saved me quite a bit of time...

I'm not trying to discourage you. Your question, and subsequent edit, show that you are not a dullard. Somewhere in this forum, someone posted something almost identical to what you did. I responded with something to the effect; "Idea stolen. Thank you."

I will have to find that person one day, and give him/her their $20,000,000 reward.


--------------------------------
Daddy Ombucks... Ha!
Ok to delete, infract, and ban.
 
  • #6
Any turbine added to a car would increase drag and so fuel consumption more than it could possibly generate.

It is often possible to get a 20% improvement in fuel economy from a vehicle by the addition of airflow controlling profiles. You can also get a 20% advantage by driving 10% slower on the highway. Reducing the weight of the vehicle is also beneficial, especially in hill country or stop/start conditions in a city. These methods are way ahead of any co-generation available, which would actually cost you more fuel.

Some methods of reducing vehicle drag are; boattail plates or base flaps that reduce drag at the tail by confining the eddy flow behind the vehicle so as to not increase it's aerodynamic profile. Using skirts along the sides of the vehicle can have quite a significant benefit in cross winds.

Finding ways of increasing vehicle economy while remaining within the regulations and not obstructing other road users is a much better investment than researching co-generation.
 
  • #8
Malverin said:
So it can produce more power, than the power you need to overcome the drag, it just can not extract all the wind power.
Only if you have true wind.
 
  • #9
Faster than wind

Sail boats can go upwind faster than the wind. It is well known fact

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/0e/True_Wind_vs_Apparent_Wind.png/550px-True_Wind_vs_Apparent_Wind.png [Broken]

It can be seen that a boat that can sail closer than 20 degrees to the apparent wind can make good upwind faster than the real wind.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing_faster_than_the_wind
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Baluncore said:
Any turbine added to a car would increase drag and so fuel consumption more than it could possibly generate.

It is often possible to get a 20% improvement in fuel economy from a vehicle by the addition of airflow controlling profiles. You can also get a 20% advantage by driving 10% slower on the highway. Reducing the weight of the vehicle is also beneficial, especially in hill country or stop/start conditions in a city. These methods are way ahead of any co-generation available, which would actually cost you more fuel.

Some methods of reducing vehicle drag are; boattail plates or base flaps that reduce drag at the tail by confining the eddy flow behind the vehicle so as to not increase it's aerodynamic profile. Using skirts along the sides of the vehicle can have quite a significant benefit in cross winds.

Finding ways of increasing vehicle economy while remaining within the regulations and not obstructing other road users is a much better investment than researching co-generation.

Did you ever see my post regarding my research of the NASA test vehicle studying this? It seems to confirm your statements. It was another variation of a "Wind Turbine on a Car" thread.

My favorite post from that thread was by Berkeman.

11 year olds have an excuse to be crackpots. All others are doomed to be italicized... :biggrin:
 
  • #11
Yes I did. I am aware, but the OP asked a different question.
ArielRodriguez said:
, but I was wondering if there was a way to harness some of the energy given off as friction from the drag of a car. I was looking at some of the embellishments on my excursion (clearly not made to be aerodynamic), and I found that there were several different grooves that could easily be made into something like a wind tunnel. So, my question is whether it would increase the drag to cut the ends open and install a small turbine, more so than it could create.
The subject of this thread appears to have now morphed from miniature surface turbines on/in the surfaces of the vehicle to major vehicle extensions in the form of wind powered vehicles.
 
  • #12
OmCheeto said:

I don't think Betz' law is valid here. The reason that you can't get all the power of the incoming wind, with a stationary windmill, is because the windspeed behind the mill can't go to 0, because the air couldn't get away.

With a car windmill however, It doesn't matter that you can't slow down the wind to 0 (in the car frame), because the force on the car will be less if the wind isn't completely slowed down.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Assuming a zero wind (relative to the pavement) condition, then the power consumed by the turbine equals the net drag of the turbine times the speed of the car (ground speed and wind speed are the same). With any normal power conversion device, the power output is less than the power consumed (input), so the turbine on a car ends up being a net loss.

Regarding the other posts about wind powered vehicles, these require a non-zero wind speed relative the ground in order to function. I assume this was not the intent of the orginal post.
 
  • #14
Thread closed for Moderation...
 

1. How does harnessing wind energy from a car improve fuel efficiency?

By using a device called a wind turbine, the energy from the wind is converted into mechanical energy which can then be used to power certain components of the car, such as the alternator. This reduces the load on the engine and ultimately leads to improved fuel efficiency.

2. Is it possible to harness wind energy while the car is in motion?

Yes, it is possible to harness wind energy while the car is in motion. This is achieved by installing a wind turbine on the car's roof or bumper, which can capture the wind energy as the car moves.

3. How much fuel can be saved by harnessing wind energy from a car?

The amount of fuel saved depends on various factors such as the size and efficiency of the wind turbine, the speed and direction of the wind, and the driving conditions. However, studies have shown that wind energy can improve fuel efficiency by up to 10-15%.

4. Does the wind turbine affect the performance or handling of the car?

In most cases, the presence of a wind turbine on a car does not significantly affect its performance or handling. However, it is important to ensure that the wind turbine is properly installed and balanced to avoid any potential negative impacts.

5. Can wind energy from a car be used to power other devices besides the alternator?

Yes, wind energy from a car can also be used to charge the car's battery or power other devices such as air conditioning or audio systems. This further reduces the load on the engine and can lead to even greater fuel efficiency.

Similar threads

  • Mechanics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
26
Views
11K
  • General Discussion
Replies
22
Views
944
  • General Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
72
Views
37K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
824
  • Mechanics
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • Mechanics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top