- #1
Karlisbad
- 131
- 0
If we have a 1-dimensional problem so for big n "Energies" can be found in the form:
[tex] 2 \int_{a}^{b}dx \sqrt (E_{n} - V(x) ) = (n+1/2) \hbar [/tex]
where "a" and "b" are the turning points, then could we writte the equation for energies (where a>c>b using Mean-value theorem for integrals )
[tex] 2 \sqrt (E_{n} - V(c) )(b-a) = (n+1/2) \hbar [/tex]
for finite a,b,c ?
-Another question, when dealing with Semiclasical Quantum Gravity, do the "Energies" satisfy the same WKB constraint?, in particular if we define:
[tex] \pi _{ab} [/tex] as the "momenta" conjugate to the metric then the
"Energies" of quantum gravity for big n satisfy
[tex] \oint dV\pi _{ab}(x,y,z) = (n+1/2) \hbar [/tex] ?..
[tex] 2 \int_{a}^{b}dx \sqrt (E_{n} - V(x) ) = (n+1/2) \hbar [/tex]
where "a" and "b" are the turning points, then could we writte the equation for energies (where a>c>b using Mean-value theorem for integrals )
[tex] 2 \sqrt (E_{n} - V(c) )(b-a) = (n+1/2) \hbar [/tex]
for finite a,b,c ?
-Another question, when dealing with Semiclasical Quantum Gravity, do the "Energies" satisfy the same WKB constraint?, in particular if we define:
[tex] \pi _{ab} [/tex] as the "momenta" conjugate to the metric then the
"Energies" of quantum gravity for big n satisfy
[tex] \oint dV\pi _{ab}(x,y,z) = (n+1/2) \hbar [/tex] ?..