Work and Energy at water park

In summary, the conversation discusses a scenario where a water skier will be gliding up a 2.0m high frictionless ramp and sailing over a 5.0m wide shark tank. The minimum speed needed for the boat to reach the ramp in order for the skier to survive is being questioned. It is stated that projectile motion cannot be used to find the minimum speed and that there is missing information about the ramp. The skier's mass is mentioned but it is stated that a numerical value is not needed to solve the problem. It is also mentioned that the angle of the ramp can be assumed to be set to optimum. However, it is argued that the problem is unsolvable with the given information.
  • #1
Bostonpancake0
42
0
You've taken a summer job at a water park. In one stunt, a water skier is going to glide up the 2.0m high frictionless ramp, then sail over a 5.0m wide shark tank. You will be driving the boat that pulls her to the ramp. She'll drop the tow rope at the base of the ramp as you veer away. What minimum speed must you have as you reach the ramp such that she survive?.


Two questions: Why can't I use projectile motion to find her minimum horizontal speed?, and how do I solve this without projectile motion with little information (e.g her mass).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There is some information about the ramp missing to solve the problem.
The free fall can be solved like a projectile motion, but you have to consider that the skier has to climb the ramp first, too.

Here is the mass: m.
You don't need a numerical value to solve the problem.
 
  • #3
You have to use projectile motion, but you do not need the mass.
You can assume that the angle of the ramp is set to optimum, so as the skier needs the minimum speed to overcome the shark tank.

ehild
 
  • #4
You can assume the optimim angle of the ramp but I would run to the instructor and tell him his problem is unsolvable with the given information also!
 
  • #5


As a scientist, it is important to approach problems with critical thinking and thorough analysis. In this scenario, it is not appropriate to use projectile motion to find the minimum horizontal speed for the water skier to survive. This is because projectile motion assumes that there are no external forces acting on the object, and in this case, there are external forces such as air resistance and the force of the boat pulling the skier.

To solve this problem without using projectile motion, we can use the principles of work and energy. The skier needs to have enough kinetic energy to overcome the gravitational potential energy as she glides up the ramp and enough horizontal velocity to clear the shark tank. We can calculate the minimum speed needed using the conservation of energy principle.

First, we need to determine the potential energy of the skier at the top of the ramp. This can be calculated using the formula PE = mgh, where m is the mass of the skier, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height of the ramp. Since the ramp is frictionless, we can assume that all of the skier's initial potential energy will be converted into kinetic energy.

Next, we can calculate the kinetic energy needed for the skier to clear the shark tank. This can be calculated using the formula KE = 1/2mv^2, where m is the mass of the skier and v is the minimum horizontal velocity needed.

Finally, we can equate these two energies and solve for v. This will give us the minimum horizontal velocity needed for the skier to survive the stunt without using projectile motion or knowing the skier's mass.

In conclusion, as a scientist, it is important to approach problems with the appropriate tools and methods. In this scenario, using the principles of work and energy is a more suitable approach to determine the minimum speed for the skier to survive the stunt at the water park.
 

1. What is the relationship between work and energy at a water park?

Work and energy are closely related concepts in physics. At a water park, work is done when forces are applied to objects to move them, such as when a person rides down a water slide. This work results in the transfer of energy, as the person gains kinetic energy from the movement. The energy is then converted into other forms, such as heat due to friction or sound from the splash at the end of the slide.

2. How does gravity affect work and energy at a water park?

Gravity plays a major role in the work and energy at a water park. It is the force that pulls objects towards the ground, causing them to gain kinetic energy as they move. At a water park, gravity is responsible for pulling riders down slides, propelling them through water rides, and creating the potential energy that is released in a drop slide. Gravity also affects the amount of work needed for a person to climb stairs or hills at the park, as they must use more energy to overcome the force of gravity.

3. What is the conservation of energy principle at a water park?

The conservation of energy principle states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or converted from one form to another. This applies to work and energy at a water park, as the energy used to propel riders through rides is not lost, but rather transformed into other forms. For example, the potential energy gained at the top of a water slide is converted into kinetic energy as the rider slides down, and then into heat and sound upon reaching the end of the slide.

4. How can we calculate the work and energy involved in a water park ride?

The work and energy involved in a water park ride can be calculated using the principles of physics. To calculate work, you need to determine the force applied to an object and the distance it moves. The work done is equal to the force multiplied by the distance. To calculate energy, you need to consider the object's mass, velocity, and height (for potential energy). The total energy of an object is the sum of its kinetic and potential energy.

5. How do different types of water park rides demonstrate different forms of work and energy?

There are various types of water park rides, such as slides, wave pools, and lazy rivers, each demonstrating different forms of work and energy. Slides involve work and energy due to the force of gravity pulling riders down the slide and the conversion of potential energy into kinetic energy. Wave pools demonstrate work and energy through the force of the waves, which provide kinetic energy for swimmers to move. Lazy rivers show work and energy through the use of pumps to circulate water and create a current, which requires energy to overcome friction and keep the water flowing.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
995
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
7K
Back
Top