Work and Energy with friction. Due tomorrow!

  • Thread starter rgalvan2
  • Start date
  • #1
30
0
A box slides across a frictionless floor with an initial speed v = 3.5 m/s. It encounters a rough region where the coefficient of friction is µk = 0.6.
a) What is the shortest length of rough floor which will stop the box?


b) If instead the strip is only 0.41 m long, with what speed does the box leave the strip?


I'm not sure how to start this problem. I'm kind of lost with work and energy. This is due tomorrow morning so any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
159
0
Draw a free body diagram. What is the retarding force acting on the box?
 
  • #3
30
0
[tex]\mu[/tex]mg is acting in the negative x direction. V is in the positive and mg and N are opposing each other in the y direction. Is that correct?
 
  • #4
159
0
V is not a force so technically you should not put it on a free body diagram. However, in this case, just remember that the only horizontal force is the frictional force. Because you know this force, tell me what is the acceleration of the box?
 
  • #5
30
0
Hmm...I'm not sure. Can you walk me through this please?
 
  • #6
159
0
Fnetx = ma = the net force acting in the horizontal direction. What is the only force acting in the horizontal direction?
 
  • #7
30
0
The only force acting in the horizontal direction is the coefficient of friction.
 
  • #8
159
0
I think you mean the only force is the frictional force* But yes, that's the only force acting in that direction. So then what is ma in the horizontal direction?
 
  • #9
30
0
mu=ma. Fnetx is mu because its the only horizontal force right?
 
  • #10
159
0
mu*mg. Mu is not a force, it's only the coefficient of friction. Frictional force is mu times the normal force, which in this case is mg.

So yes, mumg = ma. Then the m's cancel and you're left with acceleration.
 
  • #11
30
0
ok so i get a=5.886 m/s^2. so now i have a in the positive x direction and mumg in the negative x direction. How do i implement the Work-Energy Theorem? I know the equation is Wnet=K2 - K1. And K=1/2mv^2. i know i don't have the mass so i think i have to implement mu and change in x somehow. is that correct?
 
  • #12
16
0
If you build an equation with the work of the friction force on one side and the change in kinetic energy on the other side, you'll see that the mass of the object doesn't really matter. You can actually conclude from that, the the stopping distance of a moving object (in an ideal environment) has nothing to do with its mass.
 

Related Threads on Work and Energy with friction. Due tomorrow!

Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
14K
Replies
17
Views
123K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
48K
Top