Work and Kinetic Energy of a Trebuchet

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a trebuchet, specifically focusing on the work and kinetic energy associated with a counterweight and a child positioned at different distances from the pivot. The problem requires consideration of the rotational kinetic energy of a uniform rod connecting the two masses and the gravitational work done on the rod.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to incorporate the mass of the rod into the calculations, with some suggesting modeling the system as a uniform rod pivoting about its center of mass. There are questions about how to calculate the kinetic energy for the rod and concerns about the use of potential energy in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the implications of the problem's constraints, particularly the prohibition against using potential energy. Some have provided insights into the necessary equations and concepts, while others express uncertainty about how to proceed with the calculations, particularly regarding the rotational kinetic energy and the moment of inertia.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted constraint that the problem must be solved without using potential energy, which has led to confusion regarding the appropriate approach to take. Participants are also questioning the accuracy of their assumptions about the height changes of the rod segments during the analysis.

hutt132
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This time you construct a trebuchet. A counterweight (M = 550kg) is at one end a distance ℓ2 = 1.5m away from the pivot. The child (m = 10kg) is a distance ℓ1 = 3m away from the pivot. The mass of the uniform rod connecting the two is mrod = 35kg. When released from the horizontal position, what will be the child’s velocity when she gets to the top?

There are two extra things to take into account: the rotational kinetic energy of the rod (breaking it up into two rods ℓ1 and ℓ2 might help here), and the gravitational work done on the rod. This will be Wg = -mgΔy as usual, but where Δy is the vertical displacement of the center of the rod.

Here's a picture of the problem:
http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/2929/v8xv.jpg

Homework Equations


Sum of Work = Change in Kinetic Energy
KE = 1/2 * m * V2
Wgravity = -m * g * Δy
ω = v / r


The Attempt at a Solution


This has to be solved without using potential energy.

The example the teacher gave in class was without the rod having a mass, but this time it has a mass so I'm not sure how to factor that in.

Here's the example from class with the massless rod:
http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/3025/vw4t.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hutt132 said:
The example the teacher gave in class was without the rod having a mass, but this time it has a mass so I'm not sure how to factor that in.

You can model the system as a uniform rod pivoting about it's centre of mass with two point masses at either end. You will need the moment of inertia of a point mass and that of the rod about an axis through it's centre of mass.
 
CAF123 said:
You can model the system as a uniform rod pivoting about it's centre of mass with two point masses at either end. You will need the moment of inertia of a point mass and that of the rod about an axis through it's centre of mass.

I'm not sure how to do that, but I tried to follow the example the teacher gave in class and I got it filled out up to the point where I have to fill in the KE for the rod that I split into two.
Here's my work: http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/3576/4zm6.jpg

Could you please help me fill in the KE of the rod part?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The worked example uses potential energy, but in the OP you say it is not to be used. Wg = -mgΔy is an example of using PE, not an alternative. Indeed, there's no point in calculating KE if you're not allowed to use PE.
Without PE, the only way I can think of is to develop the torque and angular acceleration equations. That will require some calculus.
 
haruspex said:
The worked example uses potential energy, but in the OP you say it is not to be used. Wg = -mgΔy is an example of using PE, not an alternative. Indeed, there's no point in calculating KE if you're not allowed to use PE.
Without PE, the only way I can think of is to develop the torque and angular acceleration equations. That will require some calculus.

Thanks for clearing that up. I see now that PE is used. I just can't figure out how to do the KE side of the equation for the rod.
 
hutt132 said:
I'm not sure how to do that, but I tried to follow the example the teacher gave in class and I got it filled out up to the point where I have to fill in the KE for the rod that I split into two.
Here's my work: http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/3576/4zm6.jpg

Could you please help me fill in the KE of the rod part?

You forgot about the rotational kinetic energy contribution of the two masses. The moment of inertia of a point mass about an axis and a rod rotating about its C.O.M are results you can just use from a textbook or course notes.

I am not sure if the analysis of the gain in potential energy of each rod segment is correct since each mass element of the rod will not be at the same height.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K