1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Work done by a force field

  1. Mar 3, 2004 #1
    Find the work done by the force field F in moving an object from P to Q.

    F(x,y) = (x^2)(y^3)i + (x^3)(y^2)j
    P(0,0) Q(2,1)

    so i need to integrate the gradient dot dr right?
    how do i do that?
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 3, 2004 #2
  4. Mar 3, 2004 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    WHAT?? Of course, the gradient is a vector! The "gradient" of the scalar function f(x,y) is defined as the vector fxi+ fyj. Wakingrufus was referring to vector quantity F(x,y) = (x^2)(y^3)i + (x^3)(y^2)j AS a gradient, not taking the gradient of it. (At least I hope not!)

    Yes, you could do this by picking some arbitrary path from P to Q (straight line might be easy), since the problem did not give you one. If this is not a "conservative" force field then the work depends on the path and there is not enough information.

    Assuming that this a good problem and the force field is conservative, then a simpler way to do this is to find the potential (the function f so that this vector is the gradient of f).

    Such a function would have to have fx= x2y[/sup]3[/sup] and fy= x3y2.
    From fx= x2y[/sup]3[/sup], f(x,y)= (1/3)x3y3+ g(y) (Since differentiating wrt x treats y as a constant). Differentiating that, fy= x3y2+ g' and that must be equal to x3y2. Okay, that just tells us g is a constant so the "potential function" (really and anti-derivative) is (1/3)x3y3+ C
    Evaluate that at P and Q and subtract.
  5. Mar 3, 2004 #4
    thank you. yes it is conservative. i forgot to mention that i guess.
  6. Mar 3, 2004 #5


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Actually, I checked that it was "conservative" (REAL mathematicians would say "exact differential"!) before I did the problem:
    The derivative of x2y3 with respect to y is
    3x2y2 and the derivative of x3y2 with respect to y is 3x2y[/sup]. Those are the same so the differential is "exact".
  7. Mar 4, 2004 #6
    Heh, heh, heh... cookiemonster's confusing himself again. Oops?

    Mixed up gradient and divergence. Was thinking [itex]\nabla[/itex] applied to a vector (which, little to my credit, is a scalar...).

    Moral of the day: read slower and think more. Sorry about that. Please excuse me while I jump off a bridge.

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Work done by a force field