Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Work done by permanent magnet

  1. Feb 28, 2007 #1
    Hi,

    I have two questions about permanent magnets:


    1. How do you calculate the work done by a permanent magnet on, say, an iron plate?

    2. I am aware that the force exerted on an object by a magnet depends on the surface area. Is it also affected by the thickness of the object to a certain extent? What is the minimum thickness after which thickness is not an issue?


    Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 28, 2007 #2
    The work is force times distance (when linear) or better, the integral of force to the distance it acted upon.

    Thickness of what, the metal plate of the magnet.
     
  4. Feb 28, 2007 #3
    Thanks for that.

    But the problem is that the force increases as the distance between the objects decreases. I thought there might be a formula that takes the increasing flux into account.

    Second, I meant to ask about the thickness of the plate.
     
  5. Feb 28, 2007 #4

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    It is an inverse-square relationship between distance and force.

    Btw, your OP asks about work. You do understand that work is force times distance moved, right? Static forces do no work.
     
  6. Feb 28, 2007 #5
    Yes, no movement means no work done.

    What I am looking to find out is if a ferromagnetic plate is "sucked in" by a magnet, how much kinetic energy is gained. Also, what the minimum thickness of this plate would have to be to take advantage the full force of this magnet.
     
  7. Feb 28, 2007 #6
    Use conservation of energy, viz. the work done by the magnet is equal to vertical component of its displacement multiplied by the objects' weight.
     
  8. Feb 28, 2007 #7

    Meir Achuz

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Unless the plate starts out very close to the magnet, you have to do a complicated integral of F(x)dx. The force ~1/7 (like Van der Waals) at large distance and becomes indep of x when x<<R (for a magnet with end radius R).
    You can decide on the miimum thickness of the plate by solving the following
    electrostatics problem: Consider two parallel identical uniformly charged
    disks of radius R, a distance L apart. When the distance x above one disk is large enough so that you can neglect the charge on the other plate is the same as when the plate is thick enough. The plate thickness L will depend on x, R and what you mean by "full force"
     
  9. Feb 28, 2007 #8

    Thanks for the info.

    '... and what you mean by "full force"': I've read on one permanent magnet manufacturer's website (which now I can't seem to find) that the material to be attracted by the magnet has to to have a certain thickness, but beyond that point thickness is irrelevant. I am assuming that below it, the magnetic field will have a lesser effect on the material.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Work done by permanent magnet
  1. Permanent Magnets (Replies: 1)

Loading...