Work-energy problem (units)

In summary, the homework statement is that a uniform rod, AB, with an attached spring, has a constant angular velocity when it is released from rest in the vertical position. The 8lb uniform rod is released and has a final angular velocity of 5.69656 rad/s.
  • #1
drewta
4
0

Homework Statement


The 8 lb uniform rod AB shown in the figure rotates in the vertical plane about a pin at C. The spring attached to the rod at D has a spring constant of 1.25 lb/in., and its unstretched length is 24in. If the rod is released from rest in the position shown, determine its angular velocity when it is in the vertical position.

phpBgvMlL.png


Homework Equations


U = mgh
U = .5*k(x^2)
U = .5*Iω^2
I = I_cm + mr^2


The Attempt at a Solution


Initial length = sqrt(36^2+20^2) = 41.183 in
Initial stretch = 41.183 - 24 = 17.183 in

Since the movement will tend towards lower energy (i.e. the spring will compress), the spring will become less stretched as the rod goes towards its vertical position (as opposed to stretching further into the opposite vertical position).

Final length = sqrt(26^2+10^2) = 27.857 in
Final stretch = 27.857 - 24 = 3.857 in

As the spring becomes less stretched, elastic potential energy is converted into other forms of energy (rotational or gravitational potential).

Initial elastic potential energy = (.5)(k)(x)^2
= .5(1.25 lb/in)(17.183^2)
= 184.53 lb*in

Final elastic potential energy
= .5(1.25 lb/in)(3.857^2)
= 9.298 lb*in

Gravitational potential energy is gained as the rod goes into its vertical position.
Final U = mgh
= (8 lb)(386.4 in/s^2)(10 in)
= 30912 lb*in

Rotational energy is gained = .5*Iω^2
Final I = ml^2/12 + mr^2
= (8 lb)(40 in)^2/12 + (8 lb)(10 in)^2
= 13600 lb*in^2

Initial energy = final energy
184.53 lb*in = 9.298 lb*in + 30912 lb*in + .5(13600)ω^2

Solve for ω
ω = imaginary...?

So, obviously, I'm screwing up somewhere. Probably with the units, but I don't know which is wrong. Is there anything I'm not accounting for? What value should I be using for gravity?

Thank you so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your sums look correct but does the rod swing up or down?
 
  • #3
For the bar AB, is 8 lb the weight of the bar or its mass?
 
  • #4
Just a note on USA units: The weight W of the rod is already given as 8 lbs., a force unit. Do not multiply it by 'g'. For example, for h = 10 inches, gravitational potential energy is mgh = Wh = (8)(10) = 80 in-lb.

Similarly, when using mass units, you must divide the weight by g to get the mass. W = mg, or m = W/g. When using inches for the length unit, then in this problem the mass of the rod is 8/386.4.
 
  • #5
CWatters said:
Your sums look correct but does the rod swing up or down?
I think it swings upward as per my explanation in my original post; since the spring is already stretched, it'll want to compress, and thus, it'll swing upward.

SteamKing said:
For the bar AB, is 8 lb the weight of the bar or its mass?
Not sure - the problem just states that it's an 8lb. uniform bar... I dislike imperial units :(
If I do my calculations assuming 8 lbs is the weight, I get something that makes sense, if you'll look below. Still not sure if it's correct though.

PhanthomJay said:
Just a note on USA units: The weight W of the rod is already given as 8 lbs., a force unit. Do not multiply it by 'g'. For example, for h = 10 inches, gravitational potential energy is mgh = Wh = (8)(10) = 80 in-lb.

Similarly, when using mass units, you must divide the weight by g to get the mass. W = mg, or m = W/g. When using inches for the length unit, then in this problem the mass of the rod is 8/386.4.
Thank you for this!


Here are my revised calculations

Initial elastic PE = .5*k*x^2 = .5*1.25*17.173^2 = 184.53 lb*in
Final elastic PE = .5*k*x^2 = .5*1.25*3.857^2 = 9.298 lb*in
Final grav. PE = m*g*h = w*h = 8*10 = 80 lb*in
Final rotate PE = .5*I*ω^2
= .5*((1/12)*m*l^2 + mr^2)*ω^2
= .5*[(1/12)*(8/(12*32.2))*40^2 + (8/(12*32.2))*10^2]*ω^2
= .5*4.831*ω^2

Initial = Final
184.53 = 9.298 + 80 + .5*4.831*ω^2
ω = 6.279 rad/s

Someone else mentioned that I should be careful with the gravitational potential energy because not all of the rod moves upward. Technically, that is true; 10 inches worth moves down and only 30 inches moves up. Should I consider that, or should I only consider the mass center, which moves up 10 inches, like I did in my revised calculations above?


I found a similar problem with a confirmed answer.
HVLRaXW.png

The answer is ω=19.04 rads/s.
Whenever I work this one out though, I can't get that.

Initial length = sqrt(.9^2+.5^2) = 1.029563 m
Initial stretch = 1.029563 - .6 = .42956 m

Final length = sqrt((.9-.25)^2+.25^2) = 0.6964194 m
Final stretch = 0.6964194 - .6 = 0.0964194 m

Initial elastic PE = .5*k*x^2 = .5*220*.42956^2 = 20.2974 N*m
Final elastic PE = .5*k*x^2 = .5*220*0.0964194^2 = 1.022637 N*m
Final grav. PE = m*g*h = 4*9.81*.25 = 9.81 N*m
Final rotate PE = .5*I*ω^2
= .5*((1/12)*m*l^2 + mr^2)*ω^2
= .5*[(1/12)*4*1^2 + 4*.25^2]*ω^2
= .5*.58333*ω^2

Initial = Final
20.2974 = 1.022637 + 9.81 + .5*.58333*ω^2
ω = 5.69656 rad/s

This is not equal to the book-provided answer of 19.04 rads/s. I don't know where I'm messing up.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
I think it swings upward as per my explanation in my original post; since the spring is already stretched, it'll want to compress, and thus, it'll swing upward.

My mistake. I'm used to working in SI units and assumed 8lbs was the mass rather than the weight so I incorrectly multiplied by g. That would mean the force excerted by the rod would be greater than the spring and it would swing downwards stretching the spring even more.
 
  • #7
CWatters said:
My mistake. I'm used to working in SI units and assumed 8lbs was the mass rather than the weight so I incorrectly multiplied by g. That would mean the force excerted by the rod would be greater than the spring and it would swing downwards stretching the spring even more.

So, to confirm, the rod does indeed swing upwards, right?
Would you mind checking over my calculations for the alternate problem I posted? I can't seem to get the supposed correct answer (according to the book). The problem's in SI units :)
 
  • #8
Have you got the moment of inertia right? I worked it out as follows..

The moment of inertia about the end of a rod is

(1/3)ml2

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi2.html

You have two rods of mass m/4 and 3m/4 and lenghts L/4 and 3L/4 so..

I = Ileft + Iright
I = (1/3)(m/4)(L/4)2 + (1/3)(3m/4)(3L/4)2
= (m/12) L2/16 + (3m/12) 9L2/16
= (m/192) L2 + (27m/192) L2
= (28m/192) L2
 
  • #9
drewta said:
So, to confirm, the rod does indeed swing upwards, right?

Yes I believe so.
 
  • #10
CWatters said:
Have you got the moment of inertia right? I worked it out as follows..

The moment of inertia about the end of a rod is

(1/3)ml2

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi2.html

You have two rods of mass m/4 and 3m/4 and lenghts L/4 and 3L/4 so..

I = Ileft + Iright
I = (1/3)(m/4)(L/4)2 + (1/3)(3m/4)(3L/4)2
= (m/12) L2/16 + (3m/12) 9L2/16
= (m/192) L2 + (27m/192) L2
= (28m/192) L2
(28m/192) L2 resolves out to .58333 when m=4kg and L=1m are inputted. .58333 is the same as my calculations for I.

Doesn't look like moment of inertia is the problem. =/

I suppose the book-provided solution could be incorrect...
 

1. What is work-energy problem in physics?

The work-energy problem is a concept in physics that deals with the relationship between work done and energy. It is commonly used to analyze the motion of objects and determine the amount of energy required for that motion.

2. What are the units of work and energy?

The SI unit for work is joule (J) and the SI unit for energy is also joule (J). However, other common units for work and energy include foot-pounds (ft-lb), kilowatt-hour (kWh), and calorie (cal).

3. How do you calculate work and energy in a work-energy problem?

In a work-energy problem, work is calculated by multiplying the force applied on an object by the displacement of the object in the direction of the force. Energy, on the other hand, is calculated by multiplying the force by the distance traveled.

4. What is the relationship between work and kinetic energy?

Work and kinetic energy are closely related concepts in a work-energy problem. The work done on an object is equal to the change in kinetic energy of that object. This means that when work is done on an object, its kinetic energy increases or decreases depending on the direction of the work.

5. Can work and energy be negative in a work-energy problem?

Yes, work and energy can be negative in a work-energy problem. This happens when the force and displacement are in opposite directions, resulting in a negative value for work. Negative energy can also occur when work is done to decrease the kinetic energy of an object.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
55
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
418
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
348
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
725
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
341
Back
Top