A few years ago I challenged my class to use the method of volumes by slicing to(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

compute the volume of a 4 ball,

knowing the volume of a 3-ball. This leads to a slightly challenging trig

integral, but not out of reach for a strong

calculus student. (no one did it however.)

This Fall while teaching the concept of work, I noticed the work integral for

pumping liquid from a tank,

is just the "cylindrical shells" integral for 4 dimensional volume (except for

the factor of 2 pi).

So if they have computed the relatively easy integral of work

to empty a unit radius hemispherical tank of unit density liquid as pi/4,

it follows that the volume of a 4 ball of radius a, is (2pi)(pi/4)a^4 = (pi)^2

(a^4)/2.

Is this a standard observation?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Work versus volume

Loading...

Similar Threads - versus volume | Date |
---|---|

I N-th dimensional Riemann integral | Jan 15, 2018 |

Integration by Parts versus the Power Rule | Jan 20, 2013 |

Vector Notation, arrow coupled with hat versus hat alone | Sep 24, 2012 |

[(f(x+h) - f(x))/h] versus [(f(x) - f(0))/x] | Dec 6, 2011 |

Weak versus strong convergence | May 6, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**