Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Would the energy be in if you used grams for mass and km/sec for c?

  1. Apr 30, 2005 #1
    What unit would the energy be in if you used grams for mass and km/sec for c?

    And how many lights or something would 1 gram of the energy fuel (for comparision).

    Thanks
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2005
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 30, 2005 #2
    for kilograms, meters, and seconds, you would get joules. if you use kilometers instead of meters you would be getting kJ, since a kilometer is 1000m. If you use kilometers and grams, you would (I believe) be getting joules, since the "1000" conversion facor for meters -> kilometers and kilograms -> grams cancels.

    Your second question can be answered by plugging in the mass in kilograms.
     
  4. Apr 30, 2005 #3
    Look at the Joule, the standard unit of energy and see how your units relate.

    [tex]Joule = \frac{m^2*kg}{s^2}[/tex]
     
  5. Apr 30, 2005 #4

    SpaceTiger

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It depends on how long you want to fuel them for. Lights require a certain amount of energy per second (in mks units, that's "watts") to stay alight. If 1 gram of mass energy were converted with 100% efficiency to power the light, then it could keep a 100-Watt light bulb going for 30,000 years (or 300 for 100 years)!
     
  6. Apr 30, 2005 #5

    rbj

    User Avatar

    megaJoules

    not quite. there is a square term in [tex] E = m c^2 [/tex] for the kilometers that isn't there for kilograms or for Joules.

    r b-j
     
  7. May 1, 2005 #6

    Danger

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Why change it? The equation was formulated in the gram/centimetre/second system. Just convert your kilometres to metres first.
     
  8. May 1, 2005 #7
    The questioner appears to be asking for the purpose of understanding what happens when certain things are done. In this case it pertains to units.
    The equation was not formulated in terms of any units whatsoever.

    Pete
     
  9. May 1, 2005 #8

    Danger

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Sorry; I misunderstood the question.

    Perhaps a poor choice of words on my part; when Einstein first used it, those were the units that he employed. You couldn't arbitrarily change it to energy in dynes, mass in metric tonnes, and speed in rods per hour and still get a reasonable result.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?