I want to prove Lemma 2.1(1) in this paper, the first pdf file in the page(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

This is my proof.

. Since H is X−s−permutable in G, then for P Sylow of G there exists x [itex]\in[/itex] X such that P[itex]^{x}[/itex]H=HP[itex]^{x}[/itex]. The Sylow of N are of the form P∩N. Thus,(P∩N)[itex]^{x}[/itex]H=H(P∩N)[itex]^{x}[/itex]. Hence, H is X−s−permutable in N.

The problem is, according to the definition in the second page, that X [itex]\subseteq[/itex] G but in my proof X may not be a subset of N.

Thanks in advance.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# X-s-permutable subgroups.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**