let me know if u think i did this proof correctly...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

use the definition of linear independence to prove that if [tex]{u_1,u_2,...,u_n}[/tex] is a linearly independent set, then [tex]{u_1,u_2,...,u_k}[/tex] is also a linearly independent set for any

[tex]k = 2,3,...,n-1[/tex]

well heres what i did...

if the set of vectors [tex]{u_1,u_2,...,u_n}[/tex] is linearly independent then none of the vectors in that set is linear combination of the others. therefore

[tex]c_1 u_1 + c_2 u_2 + ... + c_n u_n = \vect{0} [/tex] is satisfied only by the set of scalars [tex] {c_1,c_2,...,c_n}[/tex] that is [tex]c_1 = 0, c_2 = 0, ..., c_n = 0[/tex] then.. [tex] c_1 u_1 + c_2 u_2 +...+c_(n-1) u_(n-1) = -c_n u_n[/tex] should only be satisfied by the same set where [tex]c_1 = 0, c_2 = 0, ..., c_n = 0[/tex] because no vector is a linear combination of the others by definition. thus this can be expanded to...[tex]c_1 u_1 + c_1 u_2 + ... + c_k u_k = -c_n u_n -c_(n-1) u_(n-1) - ... -c_(k+1) u_(k+1)[/tex] the only solution is the set where [tex]c_1 = 0, c_2 = 0, ..., c_n = 0[/tex], thus the set [tex] {u_1,u_2, ...,u_k}[/tex] is linearly independent for any [tex]k=2,3,...,n-1.[/tex]

tell me what u think..

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Yet another proof

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**