- #1
- 4,219
- 67
Which magazine do you have or would you like to have a subscription to? (not that I'm buying ) I'm thinking about subscribing to The Economist and NewsWeek, something else I should consider?
Monique said:www.AskMen.com ? I'm not sure if such a magazine you describe doesn't exist, otherwise it could be a hole in the market
Monique said:Which magazine do you have or would you like to have a subscription to? (not that I'm buying ) I'm thinking about subscribing to The Economist and NewsWeek, something else I should consider?
Monique said:Hm, I like ScienceNews.. since it contains news. The two you mention are too popularized in my opinion. I think it is more interesting to have a subscription to something that is different from the field you're in: it broadens your perspective
Well, I always got a kick out of the World Weekly News (such creative minds!).Monique said:...something else I should consider?
BoulderHead said:Well, I always got a kick out of the World Weekly News (such creative minds!).
pace said:I'd like a magazine for men that's like but not as sleazy as Maxim, but it doesn't exist. Here anyway. Women got hundreds of these magazines, but we don't have ONE. Really unfair.
Maybe it'll come soon.
What I mean is kinda like Cosmo but with men interests and viewpoint of course. So entertainment+clothers+genderal stuff+misc articles+science.
'Economic rationalism rules, OK?' - markets know best, social goals must be addressed via good economics (e.g. legislating against child labour isn't likely to be a good way to go; bring in competition to education), ... this means they are somewhat right (cf left), generally have pretty harsh things to say about greens (they're not 'anti-environment' per se), and so on. They are also explicitly libertarian (I think that's the word), so their positions on some issues is definitely not mainstream (drugs, gay marriage, ...).Monique said:How is The Economist prejudiced?
:surprise: :rofl: that's ... errmmm ... uh ... unique ...Math Is Hard said:The ongoing Osama and Saddam love saga was some of the finest "reporting" I've ever read.
Although I don't know if it is representative of their science policy as a whole, one indicator of their slant is that they are ardent supporters of Bjorn Lomborg (the 'Sceptical Environmentalist' guy).Nereid said:[The Economist] generally [has] pretty harsh things to say about greens (they're not 'anti-environment' per se)
Was that the one that showed the picture of Saddam dressed in a tutu, or was that Star magazine? (I love standing at the grocery store checkout line.)Math Is Hard said:The ongoing Osama and Saddam love saga was some of the finest "reporting" I've ever read.
Oh, if only I could have landed a job as a reporter on that 'dream team'... :rofl:Math Is Hard said:ahh.. Boulderhead. You and I share a guilty pleasure!
The ongoing Osama and Saddam love saga was some of the finest "reporting" I've ever read.
That sounds like the WWN, for sure! I am sure sorry I missed the week that featured Saddam in a tutu. :rofl:Evo said:Was that the one that showed the picture of Saddam dressed in a tutu, or was that Star magazine? (I love standing at the grocery store checkout line.)
The Economist and NewsWeek, something else I should consider?
I'd like a magazine for men that's like but not as sleazy as Maxim, but it doesn't exist. Here anyway.
There are tons of non-sleazy Men's magazines catering to men's interests. Esquire, GQ, Details..and probably some more I haven't heard of.
pace said:I don't drink alcohol and I don't meet a lot of nude women damnit! lol
pace said:Maybe I just don't like alcohol much :p And Maybe I care more about women than for them just being nude ;)