Archaeology is a bit of a clumsy tool when it comes proving historical facts. I believe that we can all agree with that. However, there are some people who are even more extremist in their views and want Archaeology to be of a much lower status. I am curious if you guys agree with the 2 quotes below? 1. "Archaeology is only a supplement to History." 2. "Archaeology is not only clumsy, it cannot be used to disprove historical textual evidence."