Exploring the Concept of a Negative Gravitational Energy Universe

In summary, this model relies on negative gravitational energy, and if the energy density isn't balanced by zero, rapid expansion occurs and creates a false vacuum. In order to sustain energy conservation, energy is borrowed from gravity. With that energy quantum tunneling occurs and real particles are created.
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes it is only by convention. See the following.

From here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potent...ion_where_gravitational_energy_is_negative.3F
Why choose a convention where gravitational energy is negative?

As with all potential energies, only differences in gravitational potential energy matter for most physical purposes, and the choice of zero point is arbitrary. Given that there is no reasonable criterion for preferring one particular finite r over another, there seem to be only two reasonable choices for the distance at which U becomes zero: r=0 and r=\infty. The choice of U=0 at infinity may seem peculiar, and the consequence that gravitational energy is always negative may seem counterintuitive, but this choice allows gravitational potential energy values to be finite, albeit negative.

The singularity at r=0 in the formula for gravitational potential energy means that the only other apparently reasonable alternative choice of convention, with U=0 for r=0, would result in potential energy being positive, but infinitely large for all nonzero values of r, and would make calculations involving sums or differences of potential energies beyond what is possible with the real number system. Since physicists abhor infinities in their calculations, and r is always non-zero in practice, the choice of U=0 at infinity is by far the more preferable choice, even if the idea of negative energy in a gravity well appears to be peculiar at first.

The negative value for gravitational energy also has deeper implications that make it seem more reasonable in cosmological calculations where the total energy of the universe can meaningfully be considered; see inflation theory for more on this.
 
  • #4
This is a description of false vacuum inflationary model. In essence the gravity is the balancer to make the sum of total forces/energy= zero. The other factor not mentioned is vacuum energy between the true vacuum/false vacuum. This model has numerous problems which led to other inflationary models in the following sequence. old inflationary model, new inflationary model. eternal inflationary model, chaotic inflationary model. etc. the list goes on. The main problem with A.Guth's model has to do with runaway inflation. It never stops inflating. Some models proposed pocket universes from this model. Severla multiverse models also use it.
As stated its main problem has never been settled. However if you wish to study it start with false vacuum/true vaccuum. Its a model that is not as popular as it once was. Hope that helps
 
  • #5
Oh, well that went over my head. It's okay though as I probably can't understand it at this point in time.

If it's an unpopular model, I wonder why he has mentioned it in this video: http://youtu.be/D6XAkVA7RmY?t=4m2s I suppose it's because he believes that it is true.
 
  • #6
This recent threada covers it fairly well, Their is numerous articles and explanations in the thread including a few alterate models.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=674090.

quicke explanation i copied from the above thread.

Here is a quick guideline on process.
Key point in order for this model to work is that energy density must balance with zero energy. Gravity being considered as negative energy.
Rapid expansion occurs this creates a false vacuum. This false vaccuum. To maintain energy conservation energy is borrowed. I can't recall what the model states its borrowed from but if I recall its borrowed from gravity.
With that energy quantum tunneling occurs from virtual particles. Some of the virtual particles tunnel to the true vacuum. Leaving real particles.

It should be noted that virtual particles are created in a large variety of sources. Cosmological horizons. =Unruh radiation. Blackholes is Hawking radiation. Schwinger particle production is electromagnetic disturbences. Parker radiation is due to expansion.
All of the above are various blackbody radiation.

There are countless other particle production methods.
What they all boil down to is a vacuum is never empty.
False vacuum being the lowest energy state has quantum fluctuations described by Heisenburg uncertainty principle. Those fluctuations in turn create virtual particles. Those virtual particles in the right circumstances become real particles.
Throughout out all this for this model the energy density must stay equal to zero with gravity and vacuum energy as part of the balancers.
However even if the energy density isn't zero the various particle production methods describe above are all still valid.
Sounds crazy however their is tons of research and models that support this ultimate free lunch.
 
Last edited:

1. What is a negative gravitational energy universe?

A negative gravitational energy universe is a theoretical concept that suggests the existence of a universe with negative gravitational energy. This means that objects in this universe would repel each other instead of attracting each other as in our current universe.

2. How is this concept different from our current understanding of gravity?

In our current understanding of gravity, objects with mass are attracted to each other due to the force of gravity. However, in a negative gravitational energy universe, objects would repel each other due to negative gravitational energy, which is a hypothetical form of energy that opposes the force of gravity.

3. What evidence is there for a negative gravitational energy universe?

Currently, there is no direct evidence for a negative gravitational energy universe. This concept is still purely theoretical and has not been observed or confirmed by scientific experiments. However, some theories in physics, such as string theory, suggest the possibility of negative gravitational energy.

4. How would a negative gravitational energy universe affect the behavior of matter?

If a negative gravitational energy universe did exist, the behavior of matter would be drastically different from our current universe. Instead of objects being pulled towards each other, they would be pushed away from each other. This could lead to a universe that expands at an accelerated rate and has a different structure and composition than our own.

5. What implications would a negative gravitational energy universe have on our understanding of the universe?

A negative gravitational energy universe would challenge our current understanding of the laws of physics and our understanding of the universe. It would require us to rethink the fundamental principles of gravity and could potentially lead to new discoveries and advancements in our understanding of the universe as a whole.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
378
Replies
92
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • Cosmology
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top