1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Zero vector in subspace

  1. Jan 21, 2009 #1
    If a set of vectors does not contain the zero vector is it still a subspace?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 21, 2009 #2
    No, because the subspace will have negatives of elements,
    i.e., for all v an element of V, (-1)v or -v will be an element.
    For the subspace to be closed under addition (a necessary requirement)
    v + (-v) = 0 must be an element which implies the zero vector must be in a subspace of vectors.
  4. May 26, 2015 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Some textbooks include "contains the 0 vector" as part of the definition of "subspace".
    Others just say "is non-empty". As DorianG pointed out, if some vector, v, is in the subspace, then so is -v (a subspace is "closed under scalar multiplication") and so is v+ (-v)= 0 (a subspace is "close under addition").
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Zero vector in subspace
  1. Vector subspace (Replies: 28)

  2. Vector subspaces (Replies: 2)

  3. Vector subspace problem (Replies: 11)

  4. Vector subspace (Replies: 3)