Hi all,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

in a couple of books I read that Planck's original derivation of the blackbody radiation

had some problem related to the zero point energy, which was solved after quite

a few years (when Schroedinger formulated his equation).

I sort of see this problem, but I'm not sure the above story has some real basis.

The point seems to be the ability of Planck's distribution to result in equipartition

at large temperatures.

It seems to me thatformallyequipartition can be equivalently obtained independent

of the presence of the ZPE, by expanding the exponential in the average energy of a single

oscillator. The somewhat tricky point in this respect is that the expansion is truncated at

different powers of [tex]\beta \hbar\omega[/tex] in the two cases.

In particular, if one does not consider the ZPE and does not stop at the first perturbative order the energy is

[tex]\langle\epsilon\rangle = k T - \frac{\hbar \omega}{2}+ ...[/tex]

where the dots are a power series of [tex]T^{-1}[/tex]. If the ZPE is considered the second term is canceled out.

Now my question is: before Schroedinger was people really disturbed by that second term?

Because if one naively thinks to the limit of "infinite temperatures" it surely does not matter, and equipartition is safe.

I see that [tex]k T[/tex] is comparable with [tex]\hbar \omega[/tex] e.g. considering room temperature (or even ten times larger) and visible light.

But in that case, does it really make sense to consider so few perturbative terms?

I mean, if they are comparable [tex]\hbar \omega/k T[/tex] is not small, and the expansions

found in books are not really correct. On the other hand, as I say, if the temperature is really large, the ZPE does not really matter.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# ZPE and Planck distribution

Loading...

Similar Threads - Planck distribution | Date |
---|---|

B Why did Max Planck assume discrete energy values? | Sep 16, 2017 |

I Size of an electron and Planck Volume. | Jun 13, 2017 |

Planck and Maxwell-boltzman distribution | Mar 21, 2014 |

How to get the prefactor for the Planck Distribution | Jun 30, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**