Proof that MIT is crap (if I'm nothing without her)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jin314159
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mit Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a playful exploration of mathematical expressions and their implications regarding gender and relationships, specifically focusing on the equation "Me - She = 0" and its interpretations. The scope includes conceptual reasoning and humorous commentary rather than formal mathematical proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the equation "Me - She = 0" and suggests that "Me = She" leads to "Mit = Sh".
  • Another participant points out that the argument only applies to females and notes the need to prove that "e" is non-zero.
  • A subsequent reply adds that the operation of subtraction ("-") must also be shown to be closed.
  • Another participant humorously suggests that the term "it" must also be non-zero to make the discussion non-trivial.
  • One participant questions whether "Me = She" implies a relationship between women, specifically asking if it suggests that lesbians are involved.
  • A later reply humorously speculates whether this implication would mean that all "Mit-girls" are lesbians.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants engage in a light-hearted debate with no clear consensus on the implications of the equations or the interpretations of gender relationships. Multiple competing views and humorous interpretations remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions about the mathematical operations and the implications of gender, but these assumptions remain unresolved and are not formally proven within the discussion.

Jin314159
Me - She = 0
Me = She
M = Sh
Mit = Sh...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It only works for females, and you forgot to prove that e is non-zero.

;)
 
Muzza said:
It only works for females, and you forgot to prove that e is non-zero.

;)

I also forgot to show that "-" is a closed operation.
 
.. and that "it" is non zero as well (^_^). Well, just to make it non-trivial.
 
Doesn't Me=She imply lesbians? :confused:
 
If that is correct, would that imply that all Mit-girls lesbians ? :surprise:
:smile:
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Proof without words for Heron's formula
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
High School Understanding Corrective Lenses: Examining Reversed Prescriptions
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Other I need some advice regarding books (Math, Physics)
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Real and Complex representations of an oscillation equation
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
High School Plotting the Solar System's planets' distances logarithmically
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
MHB Is ElGamal Signature Scheme Secure Without Using a Hash Function?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate The Grassmanian manifold's topology
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Undergrad Can you like math without liking proofs?
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
MHB Why isn't {0}^{3}+{0}^{3}={0}^{3} a proof for Fermat's Last Theorem?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Gift ideas for sword-waving, drinking, leather-bound biker chick
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
3K