# Magnetic fields in vacuum

by Tonyo
Tags: fields, magnetic, vacuum
 P: 11 Hi, So this question might be a little simple, or not. But I was wondering about the exact nature of magnetic fields. Now obviously magnetic fields work in a vacuum(due to the fact that it's not a perfect vacuum), but would a magnetic field exist in a theoretical perfect vacuum? Now I think this would be a rather difficult experiment to perform, in order to see if the field is there, we would have to insert particles into the space were we suspect the field might be. Is there a mathematical model or theory to prove of disprove this without altering the experiment itself? Or could this be a question along the line of "a tree falling in the woods without anyone around.. blahblah" Am I missing something fundamental? Any thoughts or insight would be peachy, thanks.
 P: 1,077 why do you think magnetic fields don't exist in a vacuum?
 P: 11 Well, there is no real way to see if these fields exist in a perfect vacuum without altering or disturbing the outcome of the experiment. You see, if want to see if there is a magnetic field, you have to insert particles to the Perfect vacuum thereby making the vacuum not so perfect anymore. I suppose the more appropriate question I am asking is, what is it exactly that makes a magnetic field? Now, I know in a magnetic field you have the E. field traveling through space and alternating magnitudes over time to create this 90 perpendicular magnetic field...... Perhaps this magnetic field can only be thought of as a quantitative potential force that can act, and cause a reaction to particles, if they happen to come into it's field of effect, or within it's flux lines.
P: 1,077

## Magnetic fields in vacuum

okay so now we are getting into something. You said that you know magnetic fields and electric fields are hand in hand. So you would assume that a travelling electrical wave comes along with a magnetic wave. But a vacuum is a space void of matter. Can't you have electromagnetic waves without having matter?
 P: 11 Well yes, but that's kinda different... Isn't it? these EM waves we call light. A traveling packet of energy. An EM wave is just an EM field moving in space and time?... but the only way to get a magnetic component to the EM field is to have a varying E. field traveling through space and time??? argggg!! lets try this..... If say, we have a bar magnet, and there are particles within it's flux line, we use a special "thingy" to see the particles that will align themselves with/along the flux lines, thereby seeing the magnetic flux lines, by seeing the particles. If we clear this region of all matter- no more particles, we do not see these flux lines anymore?, but are they still there? If so what are they made up of?
 Mentor P: 15,573 If I understand your point then I believe the answer is as follows: if you have no detector you cannot detect anything. That seems to be rather self-evident.
 P: 11 Hmmm, perhaps that's the right idea Dale. The magnetic field is only made up of what it interacts with... There is a real possibility that the very logic is which i'm trying to envision these fields is fundamentally flawed, and that they have to be thought of differently.
P: 4,667
 Quote by Tonyo Hi, So this question might be a little simple, or not. But I was wondering about the exact nature of magnetic fields. Now obviously magnetic fields work in a vacuum(due to the fact that it's not a perfect vacuum), but would a magnetic field exist in a theoretical perfect vacuum? Now I think this would be a rather difficult experiment to perform, in order to see if the field is there, we would have to insert particles into the space were we suspect the field might be.
How about this. Take an empty box with a theoretical perfect vacuum inside it, and wrap a coil with area A and N turns around the box in the x-y plane. Put the box in a large electromagnet and turn on the magnetic field Bz in the z direction. Monitor the coil with a voltage integrator circuit (to integrate the induced Faraday Law voltage):

V(t) = - NA dBz/dt

Using a current integrator circuit*, we get the change in magnetic field inside the box to be equal to

ΔBz = - (1/NA)∫V(t) dt = +(RC/NA) Vout

where Vout is the current integrator output.

*See current integrator circuit and theory about half way down in

Bob S
P: 210
 Quote by Tonyo Well, there is no real way to see if these fields exist in a perfect vacuum without altering or disturbing the outcome of the experiment. You see, if want to see if there is a magnetic field, you have to insert particles to the Perfect vacuum thereby making the vacuum not so perfect anymore.
It doesn't matter that the vacuum is no longer perfect. Charged particles will behave differently on entering the formerly-perfect-vacuum depending on whether or not it contains a magnetic field. It's empty space prior to the entry of the test particle, but there's clearly something different about it.

And besides, in the case of a single particle or small number of particles, what do you call all the empty space around the particles? Yes, magnetic fields can exist in perfect vacuum.
 P: 2,292 I seriously hope that no-one here is suggesting that a magnetic field in a perfect vacuum does not exist, or that a magnetic field un-detected does not exist. Silly me, of course no-one is thinking anything of the sort. Sorry.
 P: 1,077 tonyo, the notion of a magnetic field is simply a representation of what we see experimentally. You don't necessarily want to tie your mind up by even thinking about what a magnetic field is made up of.
 P: 11 Ok so this magnetic field will exist in a theoretical perfect vacuum even without an observer, or matter of any kind for it interact with. That's great, although I'm still not overly convinced. I was really kind of hoping that someone would have posted a real good though experiment to prove it's existence, without altering the very nature of the silly question. Now, this question was presented to me by a very intelligent bio-chemist, who thinks in terms of particles, and mainly molecules, thinking in such a way can make it slightly difficult to think in terms of "fields of force", which I myself don't fully comprehend, upon being asked such a question. This force is not so much like a gravitational/mass force, where it will warp the very fabric it exists in, or does it???? I don't know if we can open up a whole new can of worms and suggest that such a field can warp the fabric of a unknown dimension which interact with our known(or observable) 4. What is it precisely that enforces this magnetic force upon our universe?
 P: 1,077 "What is it precisely that enforces this magnetic force upon our universe?" Why would magnetic fields be so different from gravitational fields?
 P: 1,077 I don't know how to answer your question but if I were you (which I might as well be), what about gravity do you understand that you don't about magnetic fields.
P: 4,667
 Quote by Tonyo Ok so this magnetic field will exist in a theoretical perfect vacuum even without an observer, or matter of any kind for it interact with. That's great, although I'm still not overly convinced. I was really kind of hoping that someone would have posted a real good though experiment to prove it's existence, without altering the very nature of the silly question.
What don't you understand about the experiment proposed in post #8 to prove the existence of a magnetic field in a theoretical perfect vacuum? The experiment relies on two simple and tested concepts; the Faraday Law of induction (based on Maxwell's equations), and a voltage integrator (common op-amp circuit). Is it one of these, or something else?

Bob S
 P: 11 Ok, so upon further research and discussions with some physicist co-workers, it appears as though the solution I'm looking for can be found in somewhat Dirac's theory, but mainly it's evolved form: Feynman's QED theory. I'm still not in full understanding of it right now, but if what precedes makes sense to anyone else please say so lol. There are some particles/anti-particles/virtual particles(idk!) and energies which pop in and out of existence causing a disturbance in space. Virtual particles borrow energy from the future to create anti-virtual particles in the present, thereby interacting with the virtual particles, and both annihilate each other, thereby returning the future borrowed energy very quickly in the very immediate future or somewhat present, restoring the thermodynamical equilibrium. These energies are what will cause a electro-magnetic field disturbance in space, EVEN if there is no matter what so every in the perfect vacuum...... Does that make any sense to anyone??? if not, I give up, and will go far away and find some kind of government desk job or something...... good god.....
P: 210
 Quote by Tonyo Ok so this magnetic field will exist in a theoretical perfect vacuum even without an observer, or matter of any kind for it interact with. That's great, although I'm still not overly convinced. I was really kind of hoping that someone would have posted a real good though experiment to prove it's existence, without altering the very nature of the silly question.
If you have a perfect vacuum containing a magnetic field, and fire electrons into it, their paths will curve. If you fire electrons under the exact same conditions into a perfect vacuum that has no magnetic field, their paths will not curve. The electrons didn't change, so clearly, there's something different about that volume of space, in spite of the fact that there was no matter in it before you shot an electron into it. Real perfect vacuums are hard to come by, but there's no sign of electromagnetic fields fading as vacuums are drawn.

What's unconvincing about this? Why do you need to complicate things by bringing in Dirac and virtual particles? I don't see what you gain by it...how can a low level theoretical model be more convincing than direct observation?

 Quote by Tonyo Now, this question was presented to me by a very intelligent bio-chemist, who thinks in terms of particles, and mainly molecules, thinking in such a way can make it slightly difficult to think in terms of "fields of force", which I myself don't fully comprehend, upon being asked such a question. This force is not so much like a gravitational/mass force, where it will warp the very fabric it exists in, or does it???? I don't know if we can open up a whole new can of worms and suggest that such a field can warp the fabric of a unknown dimension which interact with our known(or observable) 4. What is it precisely that enforces this magnetic force upon our universe?
In GR, gravitational fields don't warp space-time, gravitational fields *are* warped space-time. Electromagnetic fields are treated differently, but I don't know why you allow space-time the geometrical attributes that allow gravitation, but balk at the idea of electromagnetic fields in a vacuum. Or why you prefer a QED theoretical description that doesn't include gravitation at all as an answer.
 P: 11 I think you missed some posts Cjames, or miss-read the very nature of the question.

 Related Discussions Introductory Physics Homework 0 Introductory Physics Homework 2 Advanced Physics Homework 5 Introductory Physics Homework 3 General Astronomy 6