good beginner books?

Perceptor

Okay so I haven't done physics in high school, but am considering doing it in college. has anyone got any suggestions for good books for an introduction to physics?

Tom Mattson

If your mathematical preparation only goes up through trigonometry, then Giancoli is a widely-used intro physics book for you. If you've taken calculus, then Halliday, Resnick and Walker is the standard text at your level. Runners-up are Tipler and Serway. Avoid Knight at all costs.

kuahji

Two pretty good books to "get you started" are
"Basic Physics: A Self-Teaching Guide" by Karl F. Kuhn
This book is a good introduction to physics with "easy" math. Overall, it's a good book to get you familar with the concepts.
"Physics Demystified: A Self-Teaching Guide" by Stan Gibilisco
This is another decent book. It contains almost 600 pages & goes a bit deeper with the math. This book will prepare you much better for college, however I found the first book "Basic Physics" to be an easy read & a really good introduction to the basic concepts.
Hope this helped.

ranger

I second the Giancoli books. Thats what I used. Its very good.

franznietzsche

I had Knight as my professor. I'm surprised you even mentioned his book. I'm curious why you say to avoid it? I can't say that I liked it, but it didn't seem that bad. On the other hand, I have never looked at Halliday, though I probably should.

neurocomp2003

Serway, i think is a canadian standard. I still use it as a reference

Tom Mattson

I can't recall specifics, but a couple of years ago I was tutoring some students who were taking Physics I from Knight's book. It seemed to confuse more than illuminate, and I often found myself telling the students to put that book down and read the equivalent sections in Halliday, Resnick, and Walker. I heard nothing but complaints about the book from students taking the subsequent courses.

NewScientist

Something like "In Search of Shrodingers Cat" or "The Art of the Infinite" are good

*melinda*

The first physics course I ever took used the 'pre-edition' of Knight's book. The text was free but it was AWFUL!

The next semester I was required to buy the 1st ed. of the Knight book. The stupid thing was still chock full of typos and unclear language.

And worse than typos; in the modern physics section, the author actually makes incorrect statements about quantum mechanics.

I got a copy of the Serway book to suplement the Knight book. I was quite satisfied with the Serway book and I still use it as a reference.

franznietzsche

I do remember that the way it started with vectors and kinematics annoyed me no end, it seemed thoroughly retarded.

Ok, I just pulled out my roommate's copy of the book (i lost mine at some point last year). The Brief table of contents lists 6 chapters on modern atomic/nuclear/quantum physics that are not even in the book, and are not listed in the Detailed table of contents.

Now that I start actually looking at it again for the first time in a while, I remember more things I disliked about it. Bleh. Definitely wouldn't recommend it for someone wanting to do independent study.

Pseudo Statistic

If you mean Serway's College Physics, I found that to be one of the most confusing physics books ever. (Can't judge Physics for Scientists and Engineers..)
A good physics book we used last year for college-prep physics was Physics: Principles and Problems by Paul W. Zitzewitz... covers everything well at the level of an algebra/trigonometry-based physics course.
Also, "Physics Demystified: A Self-Teaching Guide" by Stan Gibilisco is pretty good too, although it focuses more on concepts rather than the math behind everything.

*melinda*

Serway is calculus based, so if you were taking an algebra/trigonometry-based physics course, I could see how Serway would be confusing.

ranger

Before Knight publishes his book, doesnt it have to be reviewed or something by other people in that field? Its hard to believe that a book could go on the market (and be used a text book) with such incorrect contents. Dont the professors even take a look at the book? Cant anything be done to prevent books like this from hitting the market?

robphy

I learned my intro physics using Halliday-Resnick [classic, green cover with yellow waves], then TA-ed using Halliday-Resnick-Walker and calc-based-Serway, and taught with Cutnell-Johnson, Wilson-Buffa, and calc-based-Serway. These were essentially pre-selected by my instructors or department-heads and their previous instructors. To me, H-R was my favorite and the others (to me) seemed like variations on its theme and layout. [Historians of physics textbooks: what was before H-R?]

Does anyone have opinions (as a student, as a TA, or as an instructor) about the newer entries into this genre,
such as

Giambattista, Richardson, and Richardson - College Physics (which I was considering adopting in 06-07)
http://catalogs.mhhe.com/mhhe/viewPr...sbn=0072875593
and
Cummings, Laws, Redish, and Cooney - Understanding Physics (which builds upon H-R)
http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyT...471370991.html
and
McDermott - Tutorials in Introductory Physics
http://www.phys.washington.edu/groups/peg/tut.html
and
Moore - Six Ideas that Shaped Physics
http://www.physics.pomona.edu/sixideas/
and
Chabay and Sherwood - Matter & Interactions
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~rwchabay/mi/

which have been influenced by the Physics Education Research community.
http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/homepages.htm
http://www.phys.washington.edu/groups/peg/

dicerandom

I found this book to be very poorly written/reasoned in sections, especially when dealing with the conceptual aspects behind the physics being discussed. It's possible that my first impression was incorrect, as I didn't give the book a thorough study, but it certainly didn't leave me with a good first impression when I skimmed through a copy a friend had on his bookshelf.

Pseudo Statistic

Are we talking about the same book? :\
I know enough calculus to get by.. but the Serway book that we have is limited to algebra and trigonometry.... "College Physics" is the name.
Maybe you're talking about Physics for Scientists and Engineers?

dicerandom

The Physics for Scientists and Engineers is definitely a calc. based book, that's the one I used when I was an undergrad.