Recent content by 00Svo

whatever lol my mistake for misunderstanding i guess

So basically you're saying that 10*-1=-10, at which point i argue the same thing as before. Why wouldn't the 10 make the -1 go into the positive direction instead. why is it the negative that take precedence? On account of halls, my point still stands. My question was clear enough to be...

I didn't join this forum to be criticized of my grammar and sentence structure. I admit I did word it awkwardly but I hoped the community here would be above that. I didn't provide a situation specifically because I intended for it to be in a very general sense. Just the way we count numbers...

but why not look at it the other way? Why wouldn't the 5 move the 2 five times more in the Positive direction? why the weighting on the negatives? Why are they more "influential" so to speak?

I don't see the point of all the blue but ok. Also seeing it as addition is kind of a duhh way of looking at it. That makes a lot of sense. I don't see why i didnt look at it like that. The thing that bugs me the most is that - multiplied by + gives you -. I just cannot understand why it...

Or maybe the clocks that measure it exponentially fall behind such that we have created the illusion of linearity. Also I do not plan on doing anything as extreme as that. (At least until i finish my college education) It was great talking to you though, you are very helpful and informative...

For example, when a proton and an anti-proton collide, they cancel each other out. They become neutral. However when you multiply a positive and a negative number, you get a negative. You would need negative(electron) and a neutral(neutron) stay negative, but that would mean that our number...

Im not sure about that. If we have a 4 dimensional universe then something we experience as acceleration in our third dimension here can be seen as a linear change when another dimension is removed. Can it not? On the other hand the same way we see time as a linear change, whos to say its...

Hahaha, that is pretty awesome. I was shot down pretty hard in this thread. What would be an actual model of the universe then if the balloon is only an analogy? And I do not see why we would use a balloon analogy, and then say there is no center, and then in the same breath claim that...

i understand the word analogy but i don't understand how it can be possible.

I see. I had a feeling that may be where i was going wrong. Where can i read more about the expanding of the universe? I feel as though I am not grasping it properly. @Mark that doesn't really help me because there is a center to the circle the same way there is a core to the balloon. What...

to answer you simply, yes. yes to the first paragraph, and yes they would see us as we were 70 years ago. its mind boggling but true.

Some background: I am a senior in high school taking astronomy, so admittedly i do not know much about the structure and physics of the universe. However this is something that I've come up with on my own. I spend a lot of time just thinking about the universe, and this is one thing that just...