A. Neumaier's latest activity
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread A Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality.Possibly of interest: Albert, David Z. (2025) NOTES ON JACOB BARANDES’ VERSION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS. - Preprint...
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.But his book is nearly as far as possible from the consensus textbook orthodoxy; see the last paragraph of p.20 in Beck's paper!
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.Orthodoxy is what is (by most textbooks) imparted to students when they have to learn quantum mechanics. That automatically excludes...
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.By the paper cited, we now know much better than we used to know....
-
A. Neumaier posted the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics in Quantum Interpretations and Foundations.Beck, G. (2025). How to be an orthodox quantum mechanic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20597 From the abstract: From the conclusion:
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Good theories (of which good models are anintegral part) have a high explanatory power, revealed by appropriate computations (that...
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.I fully agree with that. But it has nothing to do with what I wrote. Calculations produce the predictions. But they have no causal...
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.It is generally assumed to be in a plane wave state with with low uncertainty in momentum. This is very far from a classical particle...
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.All have their own interpretation in mind, unless they specifically mention a particular interpretation. Even in that case, they have...
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Actually only the first half is part of the Copenhagen interpretation. The second half is not, since an integral part of the Copenhagen...
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.This is not part of the 7 rules - the part common to all interpretations. It is only part of the Copenhagen interpretation.
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Rule 3 only states that the state of an isolated system evolves deterministically. It only follows that the state of open system only...
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Not necessarily - it might be that the question whether these probabilites are all equal (and hence equal 0.1) is undecidable in ZFC...
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.But mathematicians talk, e.g., about the probability with which a particular digit appears in the deterministic sequence of digits of...
-
A. Neumaier replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.In this case you'd quote (in words) a standard reference for the questionable 'only' part of this claim!
