Recent content by Achintya

Is it somehow related to photons or anything like that?

Please help. Thank you.

thank a lot sir ...i just didn't realize that thing... i know it was silly.

Wow..nice .i understand it now

Sir actually the source of confusion here was that the omega already has some physical significance of its own...its not an arbitrary variable...so u see this gives a wrong impression

so what's the conclusion?

it hardly makes a difference even if the motion were in the y-direction...what we are sure about is that its a one dimensional motion...isn't it?

but sir this is something we know that shm is a one dimensional motion, so i think it makes sense to write F=-kx..since it was observed experimentally that the force is varying linearly with displacement..

just check this out ...the solution of the differential equaltion came in the form of k/m...but it is only after the assumption that k/m=w^2 that we can see the w term in shm general equation

sir i have seen the derivation but that does not contain the omega term unless and until we take this assumption

Sir that is an example of SHM, so that will definitely follow the general equation of the SHM

can you be more clear...because i read many textbooks and i couldn't find the reason behind this assumption...we just assume it out of no where...

. but sir my question is on what basis are we assuming this fact. how would someone guess this...

.