what is not comprehensible in points (1) -(4)?
any specific one?
all of them?
you do not see how (4) flows from (1)-(3)?
any specific word needs clarification?
could you ask specific question rather than saying that opening post is not comprehensible
that was in reply to WhoWee because he is the only one who showed any interest in the topic by way of asking clarifying questions
i also agree that his comment was not directly related to the topic but i do not mind answering it in the hopes he/she would like to get back to the topic
"fact based" <> "lacking emotional connections"
"emotion" = "the response to _fact_ without employment of 'conscious mind of reflexion'"
emotion is the "older" in evolutionary terms than "deliberative capability"
it is not possible to be "emotionless" but disciplined thinking and...
everybody always has a point of view
if you are interested in understanding my point of view and are willing to spend your time clarifying the definitions i am willing to spend my time engaging in the discussion
this is precisely what is going on now with me and WhoWee
i did not mean your literal interpretation of "outside" :)
i meant more along the lines of scientists thinking a behaving a certain way when they discuss science they do with their peers and the way they think and behave when they express opinions and act upon their "beliefs" on the topics...
not exactly
scientists are "scientists" only in their labs and when they step out they are like "everybody else" who "has kids to feed and bills to pay"
my post is about the fact that such situation is not sustainable over deep (evolutionary) time
the science has progressed enough by...
my interest is to discuss evolution of our socio-economic system as it is implied by the accumulated to date science and what scientists should do when they step out of their labs and are doing what non-scientists are doing - that is to continuing "default human condition" withat regard to what...
to answer your question i woud need clarify with you your definition of "cautious" and "conservative"
my original post referred to "science" as the process of accumulation of knowledge in such a way that each "addition" is consistant and non-contradictory to the whole body of knowledge...
I have reviewed the guidlines again and did not immediately see how my suggestion for the thread is inappropriate.
Is this thread in the wrong place in the forum?
scientists should form the group that will become a seed group to "speed up" this inevitable process
this seed group of scientists will form sooner or later but the sooner the better because every day counts as the socio-economic system out of our primitive evolutionary origins as...
1 - 'Current socio-economic system is an artifact of (thus-far) intellectual development' -a fact of biological and anthropological sciences.
2 - Genetic imperative drives the life-form to 'live as long as possible as a life-form' -human in particular here -a same such fact of biological...
I have read some papers that some researchers believe with the development of technology, our evolution will come to a halt.
1 - What is your oppinion about it?
2 - What will our brain turn to be?
3 - What about of our other organs?
4 - Is there any possibility that we can control the...