Would you mind pointing out where I am wrong since I can't do so even though I understand your first paragraph. And I can't see the link between your second paragraph and my statement, would you mind pointing that out also?
New thought
I have a new thought now, please check whether I am correct
Base on the principle that moving object relative to some reference frame would be shorter from that frame of reference.
Take the same example,
First frame S, which is earth.
Second frame S', which is rest relative...
But, since velocity is relative. Can the following paragraph be true?
From the frame of reference, S, in which the Earth is stationary and the rocket is moving, it is the distance to the rocket that is shorter. From the frame of reference, S', in which the rocket is stationary and the Earth is...
Statement1: From frame of S, we will see the distance the rocket shorter
I can't understand that how from the frame of S, we will see the length of rocket shorter if statement1 is correct.
The distance and the length of rocket shorter at the same time?
Consider the following case:
First frame S, which is earth.
Second frame S', which is rest relative to rocket.
Rocket are moving in speed of v relative to earth.
Problem:
Due to time dilation, from frame of S, the clock in rocket is running slower.
Likewise, due to time dilation, from...