Recent content by BillhB
-
B
Need help going back through test question
Hey Mark, Thanks for the input, yeah I thought what I did was variation of parameters and couldn't make out some of the comments either. I'll talk to the professor. Thanks for the input and your time.- BillhB
- Post #9
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
B
Need help going back through test question
Hey, not really looking for authority, just wondering how to interpret the comments. I rework missed questions, but I don't really understand what I missed. I know I didn't justify everything, but like I said I didn't think there was a need to. It was a DE class, the justification for the...- BillhB
- Post #7
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
B
Need help going back through test question
My apologies, let me know if this is better. If not, I can type it all out just worried it'll lose context that way.- BillhB
- Post #5
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
B
Need help going back through test question
Err? My reasoning is already there. You solve a system of equations for ##u_1'## and ##u_2'##, take the integral of ##u_1'## and ##u_2'##, and bam ##y_p=y_1u_1+y_2u_2##, you're done. ##y_1## and ##y_2## are obtained from the homogeneous part. I'm really interested in interpreting the comments.- BillhB
- Post #3
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
B
Need help going back through test question
Homework Statement Use variation of parameters to solve ##\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} + 4y = sec(2x)## Homework Equations Really just curious about comments, see picture. The Attempt at a Solution I'm having a hard time deciphering the comments I got back on an exam. For the first comment, is there a...- BillhB
- Thread
- Test
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
B
Undergrad Understanding "Terrible" Math Notation: A Calculus Guide
Got it. Just worried about what other notation 'mistakes' I'm not aware of. Thanks though, appreciate all the comments and time you've spent replying. -
B
Undergrad Understanding "Terrible" Math Notation: A Calculus Guide
Whoops, fixed it. Okay, but he seemed adamant that it was "wrong" notation. Terrible, terrible notation, garbage notation notes give that kind of vibe. Just a bit worried, have an exam in that class soon. Most of my quiz scores are abysmal due to notation I guess. To be fair, some it's... -
B
Undergrad Understanding "Terrible" Math Notation: A Calculus Guide
No. It was just a simple separable differential equation.. $$\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{1}{x}$$ $$\int{dy}=\int \frac{dx}{x}$$ $$y=ln|x| + C$$ It was just me writing out of a substitution for a Bernoulli Equation.. $$xy\frac{dy}{dx}+x^2-y^2=0$$ $$\frac{dy}{dx}-yx^{-1}=-xy^{-1}$$ so I had ##v=y^2##... -
B
Undergrad Understanding "Terrible" Math Notation: A Calculus Guide
Is there some standardized math text with "proper universal notation" I could read for calculus? In one of my courses, $$\int\frac{dx}{x}$$ had a red mark through it, with a note that said "impossible" or something. I earned a zero on the question due to the above. In another instance... -
B
Graduate Charge is Quantized, so why....
That is what I was assuming was the answer, but wasn't sure. Thanks. Any idea why they just didn't make the fractional charge the base constant?- BillhB
- Post #5
- Forum: Electromagnetism
-
B
Graduate Charge is Quantized, so why....
Maybe so, but it still doesn't make sense why e wasn't just redefined. I don't get how we can say e is discrete, but continuous for elementary particles.- BillhB
- Post #3
- Forum: Electromagnetism
-
B
Graduate Charge is Quantized, so why....
So why do Quarks have fractional non-discrete charge? Wouldn't it just be easier to just define ##\frac{1}{3}e## as +e and vice versa to preserve the discreetness of what we define as e?- BillhB
- Thread
- Charge quantized
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Electromagnetism
-
B
Confused on simple differential equation
Got you. Thanks.- BillhB
- Post #6
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
B
Confused on simple differential equation
I agree but I put when X = 0 m equaled the above ... when ##X \neq 0## m = -2 or m =6 and got points deducted with a red mark through the when X = 0 part? Wondering if something about above is wrong or if I need to go to professor and seek clarification for deduction.- BillhB
- Post #3
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help